| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
Demisemicenturian 
"Four ever European"
|
|
|
[matt] 
"Cinemattic."
|
|
|
Demisemicenturian
"Four ever European"
|
 Posted - 02/21/2010 : 23:45:04
|
| Just so that no one thinks films in this challenge need to be linked like [matt]'s and my examples so far, these reviews are an example of another kind of connection I had in mind. |
 |
|
|
lemmycaution 
"Long mired in film"
|
|
|
Demisemicenturian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 02/24/2010 : 22:27:15
|
Got those already, I'm afraid.  |
|
|
|
w22dheartlivie
"Kitty Lover"
|
|
|
Demisemicenturian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 02/26/2010 : 02:05:35
|
Those are all bad links for me unfortuately, w.h.l. This will be because your own default is on a down-arrow (e.g. high votes downwards) whereas mine is currently on an up-arrow (real chronological) and then you've selected reviewer name, with a down-arrow being suitable for you as that starts at the end of the alphabet. It will look correct to you because it still applies your down-arrow default, but for me it applies my up-arrow default.
The best way to isolate specific reviews is to click the chronological button once or twice as applicable (but not nought times) so that it displays from older to newer, then select My reviews only, (then change the user I.D. if you don't want to select your own reviews,) then amend Rows=100 and Start=1 if need be. The resulting link can then only become out of date if the review or an older one by the same user is deleted/disowned or if an older review by the same user is approved. |
|
|
|
Demisemicenturian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 02/26/2010 : 02:31:38
|
LOL, I'm such a dumbass. I knew about the above issue and I've just realised that I fell into the same trap. I set my default to chronological 'ascending' just to save myself some effort when getting to the U.R.L.s for the X x X thread, but of course that meant that the links were no good for anyone with a 'descending' default.  |
|
|
|
w22dheartlivie
"Kitty Lover"
|
Posted - 03/01/2010 : 22:09:24
|
| So it works for you now? |
|
|
|
Demisemicenturian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 03/01/2010 : 23:55:00
|
| No, sorry -- I was in a dumbass in that I had made the same omission (when I already knew about the issue), but what I said still applies. |
Edited by - Demisemicenturian on 03/01/2010 23:57:49 |
|
|
|
Demisemicenturian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 03/06/2010 : 22:44:16
|
In this set, the first one does not fit properly, but I think of it as connected by being a different way of reading the title (on which basis the other reviews are formed). This pattern is very common here now but it wasn't at the time.
I II III IV
7 14 21 28 35 42 49
I'm thinking of the second of these films as a response to the first one.
Eighty 80
Mine here were inspired by Cheese_Ed's so I am including his too. I acknowledged my debt to him at the time and he was happy with my extension of the idea.
Ch_Ed me me me
The second of these is one of my favourite reviews.
Boy Man
Him Her
This pair is roughly along the lines of Rock Golf's, although not as good because they don't both refer to the other title.
Modern Historic
His character name is never given in either case and he is described thus in the credits.
Anon Aaron
I II III IV V VI VII
I II |
|
|
|
lemmycaution
"Long mired in film"
|
Posted - 03/24/2010 : 21:31:35
|
ER, here's a new pair:
First Second
|
|
|
|
lemmycaution
"Long mired in film"
|
Posted - 03/28/2010 : 23:31:09
|
Comin' back at ya.
First five. Five remade.
In 1939 John Farrow (Mia's dad) directed Five Came Back. In 1956 he directed a remake--Back from Eternity. |
Edited by - lemmycaution on 03/28/2010 23:31:39 |
|
|
|
lemmycaution
"Long mired in film"
|
Posted - 07/01/2010 : 17:59:50
|
Hemingway my way.
Right way.
Wrong way.
My way of saying that I think Glazer's adaptation is more successful than Hecht's.
|
|
|
| |
Topic |
|
F.W.F.R.ers' challenge 18: connected reviews
