| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Yukon |
Posted - 02/02/2007 : 20:42:35
It may not change your tan like the good old days but passing 3,000 reviews is still something special.
Congrats to Sludge! It's been a while since I've gone through your pages and found many reviews that got some well-deserved votes.
Keep up the work!
Click below to check out some of Sludges best reviews that you haven't voted on:
http://fwfr.com/display.asp?do=uv&id=5171&Mode=reviewer&Sort=2&Rows=100&Dir=1&Start=1
|
| 11 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Chris C |
Posted - 02/06/2007 : 20:02:39
Congrats Sludge, hitting you soon. |
| rabid kazook |
Posted - 02/06/2007 : 09:51:21
Indeed! Alotta congralotta, Sludgeotta!  |
| ChocolateLady |
Posted - 02/06/2007 : 07:13:58
How did I miss this and the other thread. Got some of Sludge's zeros now. Bravo!!! |
| thefoxboy |
Posted - 02/05/2007 : 21:02:58
Congrats Sludge.
Hitting your pages NOW!  |
| BaftaBaby |
Posted - 02/03/2007 : 01:00:55
And I quote:
"FWFR Related: Site Features
Discuss accolades, rankings, ratings, new features and all things FWFR featurey."
I think that says it all 
|
| Demisemicenturian |
Posted - 02/03/2007 : 00:38:51
quote:
Originally posted by Se�n
quote:
Originally posted by Yukon
Darn it! I looked in "General" and didn't see a thread so I thought the poor guy was being ignored.
Yep, thread placement seems to be close to random these days. I can't see any real pattern to what topics are started where.
I think it was placed unusually this time to be with Sludge's 'Rank' thread - I think that's all right. These sort of threads always used to be in 'FWFR Related/Reviews', presumably because that is the main section and people wanted them to be seen. However, they are only to do with reviews in the sense that the whole site is - they are not to do with particular ones. I therefore think that 'FWFR Related/General' is the best place, especially as there is not a lot else to put in there.
You are right that threads in general are often in the wrong place, for example the recent racist film threads were not to do with reviews either. |
| Conan The Westy |
Posted - 02/03/2007 : 00:33:24
Sean's response: Young Whippersnapper!! |
| Whippersnapper. |
Posted - 02/03/2007 : 00:21:17
quote:
Originally posted by Se�n
quote:
Originally posted by Yukon
Darn it! I looked in "General" and didn't see a thread so I thought the poor guy was being ignored.
Yep, thread placement seems to be close to random these days. I can't see any real pattern to what topics are started where.
Not like in your day, eh Sean? |
| Sean |
Posted - 02/02/2007 : 21:53:33
quote:
Originally posted by Yukon
Darn it! I looked in "General" and didn't see a thread so I thought the poor guy was being ignored.
Yep, thread placement seems to be close to random these days. I can't see any real pattern to what topics are started where. |
| Yukon |
Posted - 02/02/2007 : 20:56:57
Darn it! I looked in "General" and didn't see a thread so I thought the poor guy was being ignored. |
| randall |
Posted - 02/02/2007 : 20:47:30
Yukie,
Nice thought, but try this thread instead. |
