| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| TitanPa |
Posted - 01/12/2008 : 03:02:48
...iS better?
My new inspiration for a review comes from the title of a recent movie. '3:10 To Yuma'
I was thinking of westerns I could add it too that had trains. Then a certain movie dawned on me. But this certain movie could have 2 reviews made. I cant think which one would be better or which one would sound more accurate. I was thinking about the movie 'Back To The Future III'. One review I am psure about and the other I am unsure but I will keep it in place til I watch the movie again and get the exact time.
The first review is - "88 to Hill Valley."
The second review is - "12:15 to Hill Valley" (Not sure about the time. The gunfight was at noon and the train was leaving a few mintues after. If you know the correct time..let me know...otherwise I will watch it and get the correct time.)
SO tell me what you think. WHich review sounds better? Or which review is actually best for the movie? |
| 1 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Canklefish |
Posted - 01/12/2008 : 05:30:20
C'mon man, you're settin' it up for failure... YOU know the best review for this particular scenario, you already listed it... but I'll say this.......
The film may not exclusively center around train times, I've seen it.
Go with the gut... Hell, post 'em both and see what the MERPs have to say about the issue...
You've given me rock-solid advice in the very near past, so I'll try to do the same... post, and see what happens... that being said...................
I choose the second review, accuracy be damned.......(LOL, I couldn't just say the 2nd review... had to dance around a l'il bit....) |
|
|
