| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| aahaa, muahaha |
Posted - 12/28/2009 : 09:32:55
As we move from 2009 to 2010, how about giving an upward bump to our reviews with 9 votes?
Here is the deal:
* You have to provide a link to a maximum of 100 of your reviews that have 9 votes. If you have less than 100 reviews that have 9 votes, provide links to the top 100 reviews with 9 votes or lower. 
* No filters such as "Unvoted" should be applied to the link that you provide. 
* Each participant should visit the links of all other participants to discover voting opportunities and announce once they have VV-ed. 
* You can enter till 21st January 2010. Keep them coming. We can complete the voting by 31st January 2010. 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
* P.S. You can keep modifying your link if it contains links of reviews with 10 or more votes (due to people voting on your reviews)  |
| 15 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| randall |
Posted - 03/04/2010 : 12:28:24
I voted in this game a month ago. Did not notice the requirement to announce same. |
| Demisemicenturian |
Posted - 03/04/2010 : 04:42:56
Now that it's over a month late, is there any danger of randall, hustleboy and Josh doing their voting and Yukon, demonic and [matt] finishing theirs? |
| ci�nas |
Posted - 02/14/2010 : 23:41:03
OK then. Viewed & voted way back when.
I found it easy enough to be generous when voting because plenty of reviews that already had 9 votes were worthy candidates. I seem to recall I received a good number of votes too.
|
| Demisemicenturian |
Posted - 02/14/2010 : 13:21:08
quote:
Originally posted by demonic
I assumed you'd had loads of votes given the number of times you updated your link Sal.
I did have a load of votes, that exact number of times. In each case, the voted reviews were in alphabetical order, so it is extremely unlikely that any of the clumps of votes came from more than one person. So that means that everyone else at most voted for one or two, which therefore didn't stand out in my voted-reviews list. But I'm grateful to those who enjoyed my reviews more. |
| [matt] |
Posted - 02/12/2010 : 23:05:16
I haven't actually got round to visiting everyone yet. (It's been an insanely busy couple of weeks, sorry!)
I'll hit the remaining links over the weekend.
|
| demonic |
Posted - 02/12/2010 : 21:33:01
I assumed you'd had loads of votes given the number of times you updated your link Sal. I think I probably had a decent wodge of 9s move up, but still have about 100. |
| Demisemicenturian |
Posted - 02/12/2010 : 19:29:50
quote:
Originally posted by aahaa, muahaha
Anyone else to vote?
Yep, it's strange that about five people haven't said that they've viewed and voted, despite its being a requirement of yours to do so by the end of January. And if everyone has visited but not said so, then it's a shame that all but six people found at most a couple of my reviews to their liking that they hadn't seen before.  |
| aahaa, muahaha |
Posted - 02/12/2010 : 05:05:29
Anyone else to vote? |
| Demisemicenturian |
Posted - 01/26/2010 : 23:40:05
quote:
Originally posted by aahaa, muahaha
couple of them, I've already voted most - Sal & Demonic.
Thanks, and for still looking through them. 
|
| aahaa, muahaha |
Posted - 01/09/2010 : 05:06:30
Any one else joining in?
Edit: Got everyone to matt; couple of them, I've already voted most - Sal & Demonic. |
| [matt] |
Posted - 12/30/2009 : 20:45:41
Hoping for some new double figures...
Nice idea aahaa
I've been really busy recently but I'll get round to everyone in the next few days.
|
| Yukon |
Posted - 12/29/2009 : 17:46:52
Count me in.
V&V to here. |
| demonic |
Posted - 12/29/2009 : 13:14:38
Rollin' with my nines...
Seen to Yukon. |
| ci�nas |
Posted - 12/29/2009 : 00:09:37
Anyone for 10-ish?
|
| Josh the cat |
Posted - 12/28/2009 : 21:47:10
100 9's and below
Great idea
Josh the cat
Edited
Edited
Edited |
