| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| BaftaBaby |
Posted - 11/08/2010 : 07:21:02
Originally posted by Se�n
Four Your Consideration - Treasure Hunt
Sean Says: I've got a loverly bunch of coconuts!
- Put any five reviews you like in your F.Y.C. list.
- Do not use reviews from the previous round - you must change them every round.
- Post here to declare that you've done it. Sooner is better than later.
- Provide a spoiler warning in your post when appropriate.
- You must read the F.Y.C.s of all participants.
- The next round starts on Monday or Thursday at 6:00 a.m. FWFR time, whichever comes next.
- The initiator of the next round will name the thread "FYCTH - #***" or "Sean's FYCTH - #***", "***" is one integer greater than the number of the current round. The initiator of the next round will copy this post verbatim and it will appear as the opening post of the next round, the only things that may be changed are fonts/colours and smileys (which may be removed altogether if desired) and the inviso comment after "Sean Says:"
|
| 15 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| demonic |
Posted - 11/11/2010 : 18:31:28
quote:
Originally posted by Cracovian
quote:
Originally posted by demonXIc
I'm good for a beastly numbered round in a couple of weeks. Of course anyone looking for a themed FYC doesn't have to look very far.. there's perfectly good ones every Tuesday.
If different people could choose the theme, those threads might be less of a vanity project.
Well it was BaftaBabe's idea so it seems fair enough to me that she should run it and select the topic how she pleases. Not that I've ever had a problem with her choices. Given she's choosing on a "this date in history" basis, and often on a wide ranging topic like this week's serial killers - I don't see how that is a "vanity project". |
| ChocolateLady |
Posted - 11/11/2010 : 06:02:43
quote:
Originally posted by elevenycaution
quote:
Originally posted by Choco11ateLady
quote:
Originally posted by elevenycaution
Lemmy in for #660.
Actually, in Irena Palm the woman only gives hand jobs, so I wouldn't actually call that a "ho" per se... still...
The last thing we need in this site is nitpicking. I don't think 'sex trade worker' resonates enough to make a succesful review. I'm with you Larry.
I didn't actually mean to pick any nits here. Just stating a fact. And my "still... " was meant to mean that it was still a good review.
(I certainly agree it would be very hard to make a four word review if three of them are used up with "sex trade worker"!)
|
| Demisemicenturian |
Posted - 11/11/2010 : 02:00:43
quote:
Originally posted by demonXIc
I'm good for a beastly numbered round in a couple of weeks. Of course anyone looking for a themed FYC doesn't have to look very far.. there's perfectly good ones every Tuesday.
If different people could choose the theme, those threads might be less of a vanity project. |
| Demisemicenturian |
Posted - 11/11/2010 : 01:58:51
quote:
Originally posted by elevenycaution
The last thing we need in this site is nitpicking.
Nitpicking is fine: anything to stem the tide of the make-a-lazy-pun-and-ignore-whether-it-actually-applies-to-the-film-in-any-way mentality that is ever on the rise here. However, in this case the nitpicking was misplaced. |
| [matt] |
Posted - 11/11/2010 : 01:54:05
V+V |
| demonic |
Posted - 11/11/2010 : 01:40:51
I'm good for a beastly numbered round in a couple of weeks. Of course anyone looking for a themed FYC doesn't have to look very far.. there's perfectly good ones every Tuesday.
VV |
| clay |
Posted - 11/11/2010 : 01:21:57
vuted |
| lemmycaution |
Posted - 11/10/2010 : 22:10:19
Yep and what randa11 said. |
| randall |
Posted - 11/10/2010 : 21:59:18
quote:
Originally posted by 1matt1
Yeah, #666 should definitely be horror-themed.
I thinkst alike, yet only if one dost not dare to theme thereafter. At that point, I might bethrow the fit that 'mains hissy.
V&V |
| BaftaBaby |
Posted - 11/10/2010 : 21:03:21
vv
|
| rabid kazook |
Posted - 11/10/2010 : 18:08:10
v. for the later entries.. |
| lemmycaution |
Posted - 11/10/2010 : 16:46:48
quote:
Originally posted by Choco11ateLady
quote:
Originally posted by elevenycaution
Lemmy in for #660.
Actually, in Irena Palm the woman only gives hand jobs, so I wouldn't actually call that a "ho" per se... still...
The last thing we need in this site is nitpicking. I don't think 'sex trade worker' resonates enough to make a succesful review. I'm with you Larry. |
| Larry |
Posted - 11/10/2010 : 12:42:32
quote:
Originally posted by Choco11ateLady
quote:
Originally posted by elevenycaution
Lemmy in for #660.
Actually, in Irena Palm the woman only gives hand jobs, so I wouldn't actually call that a "ho" per se... still...
According to my hooker friends, the trading of any sexual act for money is whoring, so Lemmy's review works.
Also, am I crazy, or was this a better round than usual? (Yeah, yeah.. we know I'm crazy, so we'll just assume it was a very good round.)
V I E W T E D. |
| BiggerBoat |
Posted - 11/09/2010 : 11:07:21
quote:
Originally posted by Cracovian
Yes, but only so long as it is not compulsory. I have got too much of a backlog of new reviews and I don't know whether there are five horror ones amongst them.
Not at all (although it would be against the 'spirit' of the theme). Anyone with hexakosioihexekontahexaphobia can stay well clear as well.
|
| ChocolateLady |
Posted - 11/09/2010 : 08:36:06
quote:
Originally posted by elevenycaution
Lemmy in for #660.
Actually, in Irena Palm the woman only gives hand jobs, so I wouldn't actually call that a "ho" per se... still... |
