The Four Word Film Review Fourum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Return to my fwfr
Frequently Asked Questions Click for advanced search
 All Forums
 Film Related
 Films
 A Bunch of Amateurs

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert Email Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

Smilies
Angry [:(!] Approve [^] Big Smile [:D] Black Eye [B)]
Blush [:I] Clown [:o)] Cool [8D] Dead [xx(]
Disapprove [V] Duh [7] Eight Ball [8] Evil [}:)]
Gulp [12] Hog [13] Kisses [:X] LOL [15]
Moon [1] Nerd [18] Question [?] Sad [:(]
Shock [:O] Shy [8)] Skull [20] Sleepy [|)]
Smile [:)] Tongue [:P] Wink [;)] Yawn [29]

   -  HTML is OFF | Forum Code is ON
 
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Demisemicenturian Posted - 12/23/2008 : 14:49:44
A Bunch of Amateurs

I just thought I'd start a thread on this for a couple of reasons. Firstly, it was my three hundredth full-length film at the cinema this year. Secondly, a friend of mine worked on it.

Now, it's a very twee scenario and I won't pretend otherwise. However, it revels in this tweeness wholeheartedly and sweeps one happily along. Derek Jacobi as an am-dram ham undermining Burt Reynolds's professional action hero is just great, both in practice and simply in concept. Various other respected actors have similar roles but it's the placing of Jacobi in that position that has the greatest effect. While not a fresh idea, Reynolds's send-up of a ridiculously demanding star is very entertaining too, as are the facilities with which his character is provided. Exuberant performances all round carry the piece through, much like many an am-dram play.
8   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
ChocolateLady Posted - 12/24/2008 : 06:28:41
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian

A Bunch of AmateursNow, it's a very twee scenario and I won't pretend otherwise. However, it revels in this tweeness wholeheartedly and sweeps one happily along. Derek Jacobi as an am-dram ham undermining Burt Reynolds's professional action hero is just great, both in practice and simply in concept. Various other respected actors have similar roles but it's the placing of Jacobi in that position that has the greatest effect. While not a fresh idea, Reynolds's send-up of a ridiculously demanding star is very entertaining too, as are the facilities with which his character is provided. Exuberant performances all round carry the piece through, much like many an am-dram play.



Hm... to twee or not to twee... that is the question!

(In this case, despite it all, I think this might be fun!)
Demisemicenturian Posted - 12/24/2008 : 04:58:35
My ideal for watching a film is to know nothing about the genre, language, stars, director etc. and even to have forgotten what the title is by the time I watch it. I just think it's better to be open-minded about films.
Demisemicenturian Posted - 12/24/2008 : 04:54:53
To [matt], I do in theory have plenty of time, but it's amazing how one's time gets filled. I don't know how I managed to fit in a full-time job last year, let alone the fact that I saw over 250 films then as well.

To demonic, it's fewer than six new releases a week so it's really not that many. When I worked in a cinema I watched all of the releases, and it's the same now, with the exception of things like Bratz or things not at Cineworld or the P.C.C. I'm sure that quite a few people with an Unlimited card do the same thing. As for quality, you're just pickier about films than I am. Either outlook is fine. At the end of the year, I'll add up how many of each score, but I've given about five 1s, which for me means not worth watching.
demonic Posted - 12/24/2008 : 01:52:56
I think Sal must be very much in the running for most cinema trips made by a person in a year nationwide. Even people who work in cinemas don't see that much.
It's also a bit of a surprise there is even that much to see in a year... what do you think - 25% of it actually worth watching? I see pretty much everything I want to, and that's never much more than 50 or 60 films.
[matt] Posted - 12/23/2008 : 22:25:11
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
Firstly, it was my three hundredth full-length film at the cinema this year.



300th?! I'm so jealous, I haven't had time to go to the cinema at all for literally months now, I've been so busy with uni work. There are so many films I wanted to see that I've missed. I think after my deadlines I might just move into my local cinema for a few weeks.
Demisemicenturian Posted - 12/23/2008 : 19:13:01
I remember that Tori has indicated before that it's not really used in America so much. Here it is very commonplace. I think its sound fits its meaning very well.
w22dheartlivie Posted - 12/23/2008 : 19:05:52
I've learned a new word - twee.
lemmycaution Posted - 12/23/2008 : 18:39:28
Twee thumbs up!

The Four Word Film Review Fourum © 1999-2024 benj clews Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000