T O P I C R E V I E W |
Josh the cat |
Posted - 11/16/2006 : 23:41:08 This has happened to me a number of times now and it has just happened again.
I had a review approved a while back i.e. months ago, tonight my total reviews went down and back up and now the review is listed in the chronological listing of all my reviews as being new today, as my newest review.
It has retained its 2 votes, I was wondering 1 whats happening? 2 if a dupe appears between my original approval and reapproval who's gets deleted/declined in the end?
I am not shouting and complaining throwing WAC's dummy outta the cot(especially as he does not have and will not be allowed a dummy!!) just being curious.
If your interested the review is Heroes portray real Telemark. for the film Operation Swallow: The Battle For Heavy Water (1948)
Josh the cat |
2 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
Josh the cat |
Posted - 11/17/2006 : 08:34:45 quote: Originally posted by benj clews
Your review had a typo. At present, the process for dealing with this is:
1. Someone reports typo. 2. I correct typo and resubmit for approval. 3. I re-approve review.
So, for all intents and purposes, the review was edited and then re-approved today. Yes, I realise the process could be cleaned up a little and then not confuse so much, but that'd require me doing some work... But I'll fix this one day.
With dupes, the review with the lowest unique ID wins out. This means that no matter how many times a review is re-edited, it doesn't lose it's place in the order of things.
Cheers Benj
I didn't realise that I made another spelling mistook.
Thanks for clarifying the dupe situation.
Josh the cat |
benj clews |
Posted - 11/17/2006 : 00:35:37 Your review had a typo. At present, the process for dealing with this is:
1. Someone reports typo. 2. I correct typo and resubmit for approval. 3. I re-approve review.
So, for all intents and purposes, the review was edited and then re-approved today. Yes, I realise the process could be cleaned up a little and then not confuse so much, but that'd require me doing some work... But I'll fix this one day.
With dupes, the review with the lowest unique ID wins out. This means that no matter how many times a review is re-edited, it doesn't lose it's place in the order of things. |
|
|