| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Demisemicenturian |
Posted - 10/09/2007 : 18:40:32
2002 Average Votes Per Review must be wrong, as it gives me 4.11 although I have no reviews from that year.
2002 Average Votes per Review. gives me ??? whereas 2002 Average Votes Per Review gives me 0.00. Do both work for people with 2002 reviews? Even if so, one should be deleted as there is no point having both.
2005 Average Votes per Review should be moved from Reviews to Votes.
2007 Average Votes Per Review. should have the full stop removed from the end for consistency.
2003 Average Votes per Review, 2004 Average Votes per Review and 2005 Average Votes per Review should have Per capitalised for consistency (although it would be better if all stats were just lower case except for the first letter and relevant usernames).
Whoever created 2OO6 AVERAGE VOTES PER REVIEW apparently does not know the difference between Os and noughts. The capitalisation's also worse than the above cases. |
| 3 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Demisemicenturian |
Posted - 04/01/2008 : 02:07:20
I think there may also be a problem with the top-voted reviews stats. (I have previously noted a discrepancy between a careful count of my own reviews and the figure generated.) I suspect that if one has two reviews with n votes for a film and all other reviews for it have n votes or fewer, then both reviews count towards one's tally - which is of course not reasonable. |
| Demisemicenturian |
Posted - 04/01/2008 : 02:04:03
{fa 13} says that Alan Smithee has added five films. Presumably this is from before the current accurate system and these are five films estimated as being added by the first who reviewed them, who later disowned the reviews in questions. Is it possible to correct it?
{fs 13} says that Alan Smithee has scored a film. Can this similarly be corrected? |
| Whippersnapper. |
Posted - 10/09/2007 : 18:57:05
My "Number of reviews with 40+ votes" is wrong - it reads 6 whereas there are in fact 3.
|
