| Author |
 Topic  |
|
TitanPa 
"Here four more"
|
 Posted - 05/04/2006 : 17:08:29
|
A review that said "40 of 93."
What movie would you think of? This was declined, twice. I even had to explain it. Now if you saw it.....what would you say?
What movie is it for??? Should it be passed? |
|
|
AC 
"Returning FWFR Old-Timer"
|
Posted - 05/04/2006 : 17:09:05
|
| No idea. Some kind of fraction. |
 |
|
|
bife
"Winners never quit ... fwfr ... "
|
Posted - 05/04/2006 : 17:14:55
|
Given that rockgolf's review for it has been top 10 lately, i can only think of United 93 for which the 93 might be relevent
If I'm right, I still don't know what the 40 stands for or what the review means, though |
|
|
|
TitanPa
"Here four more"
|
Posted - 05/04/2006 : 17:17:32
|
| there were 40 passengers on flight 93. Simple enough? |
|
|
|
bife
"Winners never quit ... fwfr ... "
|
Posted - 05/04/2006 : 17:17:45
|
Although not sure that us regulars should use the fourum to challenge declines - we've seen before where that can lead
No problem with newbies doing it as they try to figure out the site, but us old-timers should try to resist the urge  |
|
|
|
TitanPa
"Here four more"
|
Posted - 05/04/2006 : 17:58:12
|
| sorry force of habit. lol. |
|
|
|
AC
"Returning FWFR Old-Timer"
|
Posted - 05/04/2006 : 19:02:01
|
Hm. Well, if I hadn't have seen a couple of reviews on the site recently, I wouldn't have a clue what flight number crashed that day. I certainly wouldn't know how many passengers were on it. This might be general American knowledge, but nope, news to me.
For me, the number '93' means nothing, but '9/11' means a hell of a lot. I think it's too vague and wouldn't stand up to the test of time. If I had to guess what film it was for, I'd be trying to figure out what happened in 1993 that I was missing. |
Edited by - AC on 05/04/2006 19:05:13 |
|
|
|
TitanPa
"Here four more"
|
Posted - 05/04/2006 : 19:12:45
|
quote:
Originally posted by AussieCanuck
Hm. Well, if I hadn't have seen a couple of reviews on the site recently, I wouldn't have a clue what flight number crashed that day. I certainly wouldn't know how many passengers were on it. This might be general American knowledge, but nope, news to me.
For me, the number '93' means nothing, but '9/11' means a hell of a lot. I think it's too vague and wouldn't stand up to the test of time. If I had to guess what film it was for, I'd be trying to figure out what happened in 1993 that I was missing.
Thanx. Guess I was only thinking in American terms. Didnt think in worldly terms. thanx for the point of view. |
|
|
|
Sludge 
"Charlie Don't Serf!"
|
Posted - 05/04/2006 : 20:15:07
|
I read there were fewer than 40. Per Wikipedia (yeah, but still...),
quote:
It had 182 seats but was only carrying 37 passengers (including the hijackers) and 7 crew members including the captain Jason Dahl, and his first officer, LeRoy W. Homer Jr. Some early accounts say 38 passengers - this was apparently due to the fact that one passenger had booked two seats. The four hijackers were seated in first class.
|
|
|
|
TitanPa
"Here four more"
|
Posted - 05/04/2006 : 20:36:31
|
Flight 93
The heading reads "Flight 93: Forty lives, one destiny "
So it includes the crew too...........
So can I put? "40 lives of 93"? |
Edited by - TitanPa on 05/04/2006 20:36:53 |
|
|
|
tortoise 
"Still reviewing, but slowly."
|
Posted - 05/05/2006 : 04:08:22
|
How about "93, take away 40"  Feel free to use or ignore, TitanPa.
I'm not sure, mind - not that I'm a MERP or anything, but I've got a feeling that any variation on this theme is going to be deemed too obscure. |
|
|
|
ChocolateLady
"500 Chocolate Delights"
|
Posted - 05/05/2006 : 06:47:33
|
| I would have said "93 took away 40" but that's just me. |
|
|
|
TitanPa
"Here four more"
|
Posted - 05/05/2006 : 19:50:03
|
| I finally gave up. All mine were declined. |
|
|
|
RockGolf 
"1500+ reviews. 1 joke."
|
Posted - 05/05/2006 : 19:57:45
|
You could make it completely obscure: "9/11's 93's 40".
Don't feel bad. I could never get
"12/25 > 10/31"
approved. Can anyone guess the picture? |
|
|
|
tortoise
"Still reviewing, but slowly."
|
Posted - 05/05/2006 : 20:10:22
|
quote:
Originally posted by R o � k G o 1 f
Don't feel bad. I could never get
"12/25 > 10/31"
approved. Can anyone guess the picture?
I'll take a stab at this one. |
|
|
|
MM0rkeleb 
"Better than HBO."
|
Posted - 05/05/2006 : 20:15:46
|
quote:
Originally posted by sbudgie
quote:
Originally posted by R o � k G o 1 f
Don't feel bad. I could never get
"12/25 > 10/31"
approved. Can anyone guess the picture?
I'll take a stab at this one.
Yeah, that would be my guess, too.
Of course, the neat thing about this is that it's also a mathematically correct statement.
|
|
|
|
Topic |
|
If You Saw....
