| Author |
 Topic  |
|
Whippersnapper. 
"A fourword thinking guy."
|
 Posted - 06/19/2006 : 00:46:40
|
VV
|
 |
|
|
lemmycaution 
"Long mired in film"
|
Posted - 06/19/2006 : 01:18:56
|
| Done my duty. Will have more gems tomorrow. |
|
|
|
Yukon 
"Co-editor of FWFR book"
|
Posted - 06/19/2006 : 01:28:07
|
Viewed and voted.
This was the deadest voting round I've ever been in. I got a total of seven votes. I thought I might have had a bad link but I see other people had low totals too. |
|
|
|
Yukon
"Co-editor of FWFR book"
|
Posted - 06/19/2006 : 02:41:34
|
| My computer is acting really funny. I visited my page again and it said my reviews have 7 and 8 votes each. Another visit I'm back to 1 and 2. Time for a virus scan... |
|
|
|
Sean 
"Necrosphenisciform anthropophagist."
|
Posted - 06/19/2006 : 02:45:11
|
I've just done the rounds. Yep, I've received a fairly moderate amount of votes (perhaps mine are crap?  I didn't have the greatest FYCTH this week, I'm just going through my newies in chronological order), but I saw some pretty good ones on others' pages that didn't have a lot of votes. 
Hopefully there'll be a rush of latecomers over the next couple of hours.  |
|
|
|
demonic
"Cinemaniac"
|
Posted - 06/19/2006 : 02:49:36
|
Funny, I was thinking the same thing. It's not that hard to work out though- 25 reviewers have submitted but only 8 have come back to say thay've voted on the round. Maybe some people don't feel the need to state V&V, but it does make me wonder.....
I always vote late to catch any stragglers because I usually only get the time to do it once, but I think a V&V post should be essential - if you have the time to read and vote, surely a quick note to say you have isn't so difficult?
To be blunt I'd be amazed if all 25 submittees have all voted on this round. Maybe the next three hours will see a rush. Hope so.
edit: V&V! |
Edited by - demonic on 06/19/2006 03:13:15 |
|
|
|
Warzonkey 
"Seriously Lo-Res"
|
Posted - 06/19/2006 : 03:24:17
|
quote:
Originally posted by demonic
Funny, I was thinking the same thing. It's not that hard to work out though- 25 reviewers have submitted but only 8 have come back to say thay've voted on the round. Maybe some people don't feel the need to state V&V, but it does make me wonder.....
I always vote late to catch any stragglers because I usually only get the time to do it once, but I think a V&V post should be essential - if you have the time to read and vote, surely a quick note to say you have isn't so difficult?
To be blunt I'd be amazed if all 25 submittees have all voted on this round. Maybe the next three hours will see a rush. Hope so.
edit: V&V!
I thought the act of voting was implicit in the participation of this thread. Just because I haven't SAID I've viewed and voted on everyone's reviews, it doesn't mean I haven't.
|
|
|
|
thefoxboy
"Four your eyes only."
|
Posted - 06/19/2006 : 03:28:51
|
quote:
Originally posted by demonic
Funny, I was thinking the same thing. It's not that hard to work out though- 25 reviewers have submitted but only 8 have come back to say thay've voted on the round. Maybe some people don't feel the need to state V&V, but it does make me wonder.....
I always vote late to catch any stragglers because I usually only get the time to do it once, but I think a V&V post should be essential - if you have the time to read and vote, surely a quick note to say you have isn't so difficult?
To be blunt I'd be amazed if all 25 submittees have all voted on this round. Maybe the next three hours will see a rush. Hope so.
edit: V&V!
I always vote when I enter.
I usally vote on the first few entries on the first day and come back on the last day to do the rest.
I sometimes forget to state VV.
Going to VV now.  |
Edited by - thefoxboy on 06/19/2006 03:31:42 |
|
|
|
Falken
"Intestinal Fourtitude."
|
Posted - 06/19/2006 : 03:30:22
|
quote:
Originally posted by Se�n
Yep, I've received a fairly moderate amount of votes (perhaps mine are crap?
Whew!
I thought it was just me...
I actually received more votes this round for a review that wasn't even on my FYC list (It's not even a new review!) 
 Falken
Oh yeah,
V&V (including Pope!) |
Edited by - Falken on 06/19/2006 04:01:54 |
|
|
|
thefoxboy
"Four your eyes only."
|
Posted - 06/19/2006 : 03:41:07
|
VVed.
Hey lemmy, who you calling a mother trucker?
Got the Pope too.
v
v
v
v
v
|
Edited by - thefoxboy on 06/19/2006 03:46:37 |
|
|
|
Pope George Ringo
"the Pope on stage"
|
|
|
turrell
"Ohhhh Ohhhh Ohhhh Ohhhh "
|
Posted - 06/19/2006 : 04:06:58
|
To be fair - Yukon - all of your reviews have 7 or more votes - not too bad really. And Demonic you have 9 - 15 votes apiece. Given that the FYC players are pretty good at hitting people's reviews a lot of us may have hit these already.
The rules as stated only say that you must read all the participant's pages. Its only been the last few months that anyone had V&v'd FYC - thus I go with tradition I view pages but don't feel its necessary to post as such. The only time I miss FYC's is when the are posted considerably after the start time. |
|
|
|
Sean
"Necrosphenisciform anthropophagist."
|
Posted - 06/19/2006 : 04:28:42
|
quote:
Originally posted by Warzonkey
I thought the act of voting was implicit in the participation of this thread.
Yep, it is. That doesn't mean that everyone does it though.
People started the "VVV" thing a while back when it appeared that there may have been some entering but not doing the voting rounds. 
P.S. VVV including latecomer PGR. |
|
|
|
The General
"Forty? What? Me? How?."
|
Posted - 06/19/2006 : 04:59:20
|
I'm another one who doesn't post V&V. It seems redundant given the social contract of FYC.
If I have low votes I assume it's because (a) there aren't as many entrants in FYC and (b) my reviews aren't that good.
|
|
|
|
ChocolateLady
"500 Chocolate Delights"
|
Posted - 06/19/2006 : 06:14:40
|
Hey, I just hope that each of my reviews will get at least one vote.
I have voted on everyone in this round.
Pope - please remember that the URL is www.fwfr.com that 'www' was missing from your link. |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
FYCTH #205
