The Four Word Film Review Fourum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Return to my fwfr
Frequently Asked Questions Click for advanced search
 All Forums
 FWFR Related
 Reviews
 Marie Antoinette! Marie Antoinette!
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

Please Kill Me Now 
"Need my dopamine fix!"

Posted - 12/13/2006 :  22:16:00  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Come on, benj! Work with me here!

Sean 
"Necrosphenisciform anthropophagist."

Posted - 12/14/2006 :  00:12:49  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I'm not sure this approach will work. Everyone's got a backlog.
Go to Top of Page

Demisemicenturian 
"Four ever European"

Posted - 12/14/2006 :  09:26:40  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
It would be bad enough to have a general thread where people asked for their reviews to get precedence in approval, but to have two threads requesting this for the same relatively weak film is a little much. If one has a special reason for wanting a certain review to be approved quickly, one should contact Benj directly. However, this would have to be a good reason; I don't think I've ever done this.
Go to Top of Page

aahaa, muahaha 
"Optimistic altruist, incurable romantic"

Posted - 12/14/2006 :  09:49:51  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian

It would be bad enough to have a general thread where people asked for their reviews to get precedence in approval, but to have two threads requesting this for the same relatively weak film is a little much. If one has a special reason for wanting a certain review to be approved quickly, one should contact Benj directly. However, this would have to be a good reason; I don't think I've ever done this.



The only time I did this was when no reviews were yet listed for one of the films in the top 10 in UK chart for which I had a review pending. That's the only justifiable excuse for breaking the line, IMHO. If all my pending reviews were to be approved immediately, my total reviews would increase by 20+%. While that would be most welcome, the flip side to it is that my average votes per review would fall from 5.6 to 4.39 . No pain, no gain.
Go to Top of Page

Ali 
"Those aren't pillows."

Posted - 12/14/2006 :  10:07:59  Show Profile  Reply with Quote

I think half the fun is waiting for, what one assumes to be, a great review to get approved. Will it make it? Will it be turned down? Will this dress make me look fat? Questions, questions...
Go to Top of Page

w22dheartlivie 
"Kitty Lover"

Posted - 12/16/2006 :  00:18:56  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I don't much worry about it. I've got over 160 reviews pending, but if a huge rash of them were approved tomorrow, I'd still be rolling out a review or two or three on every film I watch. The trouble with that is, I flip through the channels constantly and usually have a film on all the time, so my list will just continue to snowball - at least until I burn out or I have another eye bleed and can't read for a while.
Go to Top of Page

demonic 
"Cinemaniac"

Posted - 12/16/2006 :  01:59:43  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
"Another eye bleed" - ouch!

Go to Top of Page

w22dheartlivie 
"Kitty Lover"

Posted - 12/16/2006 :  02:23:22  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by demonic

"Another eye bleed" - ouch!



Actually, it doesn't hurt at all, and the observer can't tell it's there. For description's sake, it's kind of like a varicose sort of vessel in my right eye that sometimes takes it upon itself to leak into the vitreal fluid in my right eye. I've had laser surgery on it, but it's a persistent lil bugger. So I don't run, or lift heavy things, or fall down (well, that's not a conscious thing), or bungee jump, or participate in professional wrestling matches, or skate in roller derby, or surf, or ski, or other similar things that jar one's head. And if it happens, I spend a lot of time with my right eye closed, as the vision through it is then like looking through a very heavily fogged glass with swirls of imperfection in it. Yay!

Edited by - w22dheartlivie on 12/16/2006 02:25:40
Go to Top of Page

benj clews 
"...."

Posted - 12/17/2006 :  00:57:55  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by wildhartlivie


...I have another eye bleed.


Cool! So you're like the baddie in Casino Royale?

quote:

So I don't run, or lift heavy things, or fall down (well, that's not a conscious thing), or bungee jump, or participate in professional wrestling matches, or skate in roller derby, or surf, or ski, or other similar things that jar one's head.



Sounds like a real bugger. I'm guessing you also can't get too involved watching the Bohemian Rhapsody scene in Wayne's World
Go to Top of Page

w22dheartlivie 
"Kitty Lover"

Posted - 12/17/2006 :  03:29:36  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by benj clews
Cool! So you're like the baddie in Casino Royale?


Um, as much as I hate to admit it, I've not seen Casino Royale... maybe on DVD.
quote:

Sounds like a real bugger. I'm guessing you also can't get too involved watching the Bohemian Rhapsody scene in Wayne's World


LOL, no, and I couldn't do it BEFORE the eye problems. Head bobbing is a refined art!!!!!!! But I really do miss bungee jumping and the roller derby gig.... *sigh*

Edited by - w22dheartlivie on 12/17/2006 03:31:42
Go to Top of Page

Please Kill Me Now 
"Need my dopamine fix!"

Posted - 12/18/2006 :  21:16:44  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Marie Antoinette was not a "relatively weak film", as you put it, Salopian. It was quite striking and original, and even, dare I say it, rather moving. I know that your avatar is sheep, Sal, but please don't think like one.
Go to Top of Page

demonic 
"Cinemaniac"

Posted - 12/18/2006 :  22:47:38  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I don't know if disliking a film, regardless of its critical panning, makes someone a sheep. I didn't think it was relatively weak, I thought it was incredibly weak, as much as I like seeing Kirsten Dunst in see through tops.
Go to Top of Page

Please Kill Me Now 
"Need my dopamine fix!"

Posted - 12/19/2006 :  09:17:13  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by demonic

I don't know if disliking a film, regardless of its critical panning, makes someone a sheep. I didn't think it was relatively weak, I thought it was incredibly weak, as much as I like seeing Kirsten Dunst in see through tops.



Oh well, I rest my case...

Baaaaaaah! Baaaaaaah!


Go to Top of Page

Beanmimo 
"August review site"

Posted - 12/19/2006 :  09:26:07  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by demonic
as much as I like seeing Kirsten Dunst in see through tops.



You've sold me.
When's it out on DVD?!?!
Go to Top of Page

Demisemicenturian 
"Four ever European"

Posted - 12/19/2006 :  09:32:59  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Please Kill Me Now

[navy][size=4][font=Times New Roman]Marie Antoinette was not a "relatively weak film", as you put it, Salopian.

Aesthetically, it was fine, but not as good as I expected, and not good enough to compensate for the lack of plot. I've so far seen 97 features at the cinema this year, and I would say that it was in the bottom quarter. I am very easily satisfied by films, so for me to find fault with one is saying something. I would think I gave it 4/5, but I give very few films less than that.
Go to Top of Page

Ali 
"Those aren't pillows."

Posted - 12/19/2006 :  09:45:44  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
It's been a wank year for films, and Marie Antoinette was definitely one of the better ones.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
The Four Word Film Review Fourum © 1999-2024 benj clews Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000