The Four Word Film Review Fourum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Return to my fwfr
Frequently Asked Questions Click for advanced search
 All Forums
 Games and contests
 Four Word Porn Titles (FWPTs)
 FWPT #73 - Tom Hanks
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 3

Sean 
"Necrosphenisciform anthropophagist."

Posted - 12/15/2006 :  21:09:21  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Downtown

At least one of the submissions is an actual porn title. Is that allowed? I'm just asking for clarification.
Yikes! Which one? I'm guessing it's just an accident though. I'd never thought about whether to allow actual porn titles, but I'm guessing if you look hard enough many good porn puns will have been used in the past. So perhaps it's better to turn a blind eye to it...
Go to Top of Page

Stalean 
"Back...OMG"

Posted - 12/16/2006 :  00:12:33  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I looked mine up after your post, Downtown. Sean, you can delete my entry, as it seems mine is the offender.
Go to Top of Page

Downtown 
"Welcome back, Billy Buck"

Posted - 12/16/2006 :  03:19:59  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Don't do that on my account, I was only wondering if there's a rule about it.
Go to Top of Page

Sean 
"Necrosphenisciform anthropophagist."

Posted - 12/18/2006 :  04:59:38  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by StaLean

I looked mine up after your post, Downtown. Sean, you can delete my entry, as it seems mine is the offender.
Done.

What does everyone think? Should we allow existing porn titles? I don't have a strong opinion about it. Thoughts, folks?

Edited by - Sean on 12/18/2006 05:00:52
Go to Top of Page

ChocolateLady 
"500 Chocolate Delights"

Posted - 12/18/2006 :  06:40:17  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Actually, I think if the existing porn title didn't win the round, it should be allowed in another one. However, if an existing porn title won previously, it shouldn't be allowed to be put up again.

(Just one person's opinion.)
Go to Top of Page

Sean 
"Necrosphenisciform anthropophagist."

Posted - 12/18/2006 :  07:44:03  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Oops, what I meant was (best to use the example).... StaLean's entry was "Saving Ryan's Privates" which happens to be exactly the same as the title of this movie here, which isn't even porn actually, it's a parody.

So, the question is, should we allow people to use titles of movies that already exist (most will actually be porn movies, not parodies)?

I removed StaLean's entry 'cos she asked me to, but this is one of the few things in life that I don't actually have an opinion on.
Go to Top of Page

ChocolateLady 
"500 Chocolate Delights"

Posted - 12/18/2006 :  08:22:16  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I don't see why not. There's still creativity in using a real, exisiting movie title, as it is, and applying it to that particular round's person, and asking us to think about that title, since it sounds like it could be porn title, or sounds like the round's actor should have been in that porn movie. Nothing wrong with that, if you ask me.

Personally, I think we should put StaLean's submission back on the list.

Edited by - ChocolateLady on 12/18/2006 09:30:08
Go to Top of Page

Cheese_Ed 
"The Provolone Ranger"

Posted - 12/18/2006 :  13:41:36  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Leave them in, I doubt anyone here is doing research on actual porn to find entries for this contest. If we are good at making them up (like we undoubtedly are), then we are bound to accidentally match a real title here and there, so be it.
Go to Top of Page

Beanmimo 
"August review site"

Posted - 12/18/2006 :  13:51:31  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Cheese_Ed

Leave them in, I doubt anyone here is doing research on actual porn to find entries for this contest. If we are good at making them up (like we undoubtedly are), then we are bound to accidentally match a real title here and there, so be it.



I'm with the big cheese on this one.
Go to Top of Page

RockGolf 
"1500+ reviews. 1 joke."

Posted - 12/18/2006 :  16:54:18  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I'm sure I'd heard of "Forrest Hump" before too, but an infinite number of FWFR's at an infinite number of terminals and your bound to accidently bump into real title.

The Green Male
Go to Top of Page

ragingfluff 
"Currently lost in Canada"

Posted - 12/18/2006 :  18:30:37  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Momma always said life is like a bunch of votes; you never know what you're gonna get

Go to Top of Page

Sean 
"Necrosphenisciform anthropophagist."

Posted - 12/18/2006 :  23:22:06  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Oh bugger it. I've put it back in. In fact all I needed to do was read my own rules to get the answer for this one:-

"Use inspiration from any source, but it must be somehow related to the subject."

So, anything goes as long as it fits the rules. I can't be bothered being a FWPT policeman hence writing the rule that way when FWPT began.
Go to Top of Page

BiggerBoat 
"Pass me the harpoon"

Posted - 12/19/2006 :  00:44:47  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Turn her and smooch.

Go to Top of Page

turrell 
"Ohhhh Ohhhh Ohhhh Ohhhh "

Posted - 12/19/2006 :  06:47:42  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I'm not a smart man, but I know what votes is.
Go to Top of Page

bife 
"Winners never quit ... fwfr ... "

Posted - 12/19/2006 :  09:03:14  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Voted, t.hanks.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 3 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
The Four Word Film Review Fourum © 1999-2024 benj clews Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000