The Four Word Film Review Fourum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Return to my fwfr
Frequently Asked Questions Click for advanced search
 All Forums
 FWFR Related
 Reviews
 What dictionary determines what is a word?
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

Catuli 
"Loves Film and Fun"

Posted - 01/12/2007 :  05:15:39  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Well, I've discussed almost every type of reason for declining a review, but here's a new one, "review has more than four words." Which one of the spate of dictionaries out there--Websters, Chambers, American Heritage, Funk & Wagnall's, etc.--has precedence in resolving what a word is. I'm sure you know my asking has an undertow of specificity in addition to general curiosity. To that end, are we all in agreement that "landsakes" and "handshakes" are both words. Please say yes.

w22dheartlivie 
"Kitty Lover"

Posted - 01/12/2007 :  05:39:06  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I'm not sure what the official dictionary of source is for FWFR, but I have seen dictionary.com referenced in forums before. To that end, handshakes is considered a single word, but try as I might, I couldn't find a reference for landsakes. Makes me curious about the etymology of the expression "For land's sake!!"
Go to Top of Page

Conan The Westy 
"Father, Faithful Friend, Fwiffer"

Posted - 01/12/2007 :  05:41:06  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Catuli
To that end, are we all in agreement that "landsakes" and "handshakes" are both words. Please say yes.


I checked dictionary.com and didn't get anything for landsakes (or land sakes). But this discussion thread covers some ground (without complete authority however)
http://www.yourdictionary.com/cgi-bin/agora/agora.cgi?board=etymology;action=display;num=1113682094
Go to Top of Page

Demisemicenturian 
"Four ever European"

Posted - 01/12/2007 :  09:13:34  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
There's definitely no set dictionary. If something is a single word (or hyphenated) in any normal dictionary, then I think it would have a very good chance of being allowed if you cite this. Bear in mind that numerous things that are definitely not single words (e.g. "DaVinci" [sic]) are allowed here.

Go to Top of Page

ChocolateLady 
"500 Chocolate Delights"

Posted - 01/12/2007 :  10:13:47  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I didn't find "land sakes" in the urban dictionary either - not as one word and not as two. But according to http://www.texas-brigade.com/slang.htm it is a polite way of saying "Lord sakes" - whatever that means. And Online Etymology Dictionary seems to think the same, but quotes it as "land's sakes". In both cases, it is two words. When you google it as one word, you get practically nothing except www.forlandsakes.com.
Go to Top of Page

Demisemicenturian 
"Four ever European"

Posted - 01/12/2007 :  11:38:31  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I've never heard of 'landsakes' in my life, but assuming that you are punning on 'handshakes', the precedent was set by Conan here/here that two words punning on a single word could appear as one word.

Edited by - Demisemicenturian on 01/12/2007 12:27:23
Go to Top of Page

Conan The Westy 
"Father, Faithful Friend, Fwiffer"

Posted - 01/12/2007 :  12:14:14  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Don't report me I've been good lately.
Go to Top of Page

Demisemicenturian 
"Four ever European"

Posted - 01/12/2007 :  12:27:04  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Conan The Westy

Don't report me I've been good lately.


In response to what you mentioned in one of the threads, I ought to admit that I did report a small number of your reviews while reading your 1500 1-voters or however many it was. You seem to have had a particularly 'generic' period in late summer (or in your case winter) 2003. However, I like your "HolyWord" review and I have cited it in the past as evidence that two words punning on one are allowed as one.

Edited by - Demisemicenturian on 01/12/2007 12:27:45
Go to Top of Page

Catuli 
"Loves Film and Fun"

Posted - 01/12/2007 :  13:38:49  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I think I'm actually giving a thread rebuttal to my initial post. I just Googled "landsakes" and the term consistently is cited as being two words. My previous effort indicated one word -- or so I thought. It is an expression suggesting alarm or amazement, basically synonymous with "egads," "zounds," or "gadzooks." Hmmmm, I would have thought that when your alarmed you'd be quick and compress everything into one word, but my research rejects that idea.

I'm surprised that the concern over what dictionary governs hasn't been raised before, since words are such a precious commodity for our reviewing purposes.

Go to Top of Page

Demisemicenturian 
"Four ever European"

Posted - 01/12/2007 :  14:14:52  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Catuli

I'm surprised that the concern over what dictionary governs hasn't been raised before

I expect that it has and the answer has been the same - that's there isn't a set one.

Go to Top of Page

demonic 
"Cinemaniac"

Posted - 01/12/2007 :  14:17:48  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Personally if I'm not sure about something (usually whether or not something is hypenated or not) when I'm submitting I check with Dictionary.com first. If it's in there, I use it.
Go to Top of Page

ChocolateLady 
"500 Chocolate Delights"

Posted - 01/12/2007 :  16:42:39  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian

quote:
Originally posted by Catuli

I'm surprised that the concern over what dictionary governs hasn't been raised before

I expect that it has and the answer has been the same - that's there isn't a set one.





[gangster voice]Yeah. We don need no shtupid frigging dicshonary. Wes got ours creativity and that should be enough for them pesky MERPs, it should! Just lettem try and throw the dicshonary at me and I'll shows em, I will![/ganster voice]

Go to Top of Page

benj clews 
"...."

Posted - 01/12/2007 :  20:05:06  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I tend to use dictionary.com (since I can always remember the url) for quick reference, but I'll consider arguments if it's believed wrong in some instances.

Ideally, this being a UK site in origin, we should probably use the OED or something
Go to Top of Page

lemmycaution 
"Long mired in film"

Posted - 01/12/2007 :  20:43:21  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by benj clews

I tend to use dictionary.com (since I can always remember the url) for quick reference, but I'll consider arguments if it's believed wrong in some instances.

Ideally, this being a UK site in origin, we should probably use the OED or something




The thing about dictionary.com is that it provides variants so the reviewer is more likely to get a break and find his/her spelling there (or not as in the case of "land's sake" which is definitely two words and has no relation to handshake).

Now let's shake hands and come out spelling.
Go to Top of Page

Downtown 
"Welcome back, Billy Buck"

Posted - 01/12/2007 :  21:53:10  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
When two men shake hands, the event that just occured is DEFINITELY a "handshake." Maybe there's a dictionary out there that lists it as two words, but I've NEVER seen that spelling anywhere. I'd go so far as to say that even if the dictionary says it's two words, spelling it as a single word is so overwhelmingly common that the dictionary is WRONG.

But I don't know what a landsakes is.
Go to Top of Page

Conan The Westy 
"Father, Faithful Friend, Fwiffer"

Posted - 01/12/2007 :  22:31:31  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
You seem to have had a particularly 'generic' period in late summer (or in your case winter) 2003.

Guilty as charged. That was the period where I cranked out over 2000 reviews in under 6 months. With a less stringent application of the generic rule, an over-worked benj doing solo approving and keeping the site up-to-date, and fewer films on the database to compare against, I consider myself fortunate to have only had a few reported.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
The Four Word Film Review Fourum © 1999-2024 benj clews Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000