| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
Mr Savoir Faire 
"^ Click my name. "
|
 Posted - 03/22/2007 : 00:09:45
|
I can't help but notice that many films on the now playing list are reviewless. 300 had only one review until three days ago.
I'm not complaining about this, I just have an idea.
When I first saw this site I immediately searched for reviews on the films I had just seen, most of which were on the top ten charts. I assume many people do this when they discover fwfr. Anyway, I believe that if current movies playing had precedence in the review queue then more people would be attracted to the site.
Any thoughts?
|
Edited by - Mr Savoir Faire on 03/22/2007 00:10:32 |
|
|
Yukon 
"Co-editor of FWFR book"
|
Posted - 03/22/2007 : 02:16:04
|
I think that already happens.
I often review new movies and notice they get added to the site quicker than other films. |
 |
|
|
MisterBadIdea 
"PLZ GET MILK, KTHXBYE"
|
Posted - 03/22/2007 : 03:49:07
|
| You gotta keep in mind, man, people have got to see the film before they can start cracking jokes on it. People have to sit and think on them before a while before they've come up with a decent FWFR. |
|
|
|
w22dheartlivie
"Kitty Lover"
|
Posted - 03/22/2007 : 04:46:18
|
| I think that's true sometimes, but in a lot of cases, it seems the most obvious puns, etc., come quickly. Sometimes inspiration comes from the buzz around upcoming films too. For me, I actually don't go to the theater, so I tend to review what I'm seeing at home. (Of course, that's a scary thought, looking at the reviews I've written lately.) One thing I often do is hop over to IMDB when I see ads on TV for new films, thus the recent reviews for 300. I do agree that it seems reviews for newer films get processed quicker, for the same reasons mentioned above. |
|
|
|
TitanPa
"Here four more"
|
Posted - 03/23/2007 : 15:21:10
|
He's been gone how long? And already giving out requests?
|
|
|
| |
Topic |
|
Site Suggestion: Top Ten Chart precedence?
