The Four Word Film Review Fourum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Return to my fwfr
Frequently Asked Questions Click for advanced search
 All Forums
 FWFR Related
 Reviews
 Your opinion please
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Shiv 
"What a Wonderful World"

Posted - 04/14/2007 :  10:14:06  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
x

Edited by - Shiv on 04/14/2007 22:45:32

BaftaBaby 
"Always entranced by cinema."

Posted - 04/14/2007 :  11:36:26  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Shiv

I joined the crowd writing a fwfr for What Would Jesus Drive?
My review was 'Secondhand Popemobile'. It is formatted as an answer to the title, just like the majority of the other reviews.
It was rejected without explanation.

Why a secondhand Popemobile - because he'd get it off the Pope, of course.

What do you think?



Yeah, I've got trouble figuring out exactly what's wanted here. My:
"moneylenders from temple" was declined even though I quoted Biblical chapter and verse about driving them out. I know it didn't have anything to do with cars, but I thought it was funny. But, yeah, it DIDN'T have anything to do with cars.

Did you submit with your explanation? Or did you try submitting just: Popemobile? My religion expertise is sub-basement, but isn't Jesus/God meant to be the Papa Ultima? [I may have made that up]

Go to Top of Page

Shiv 
"What a Wonderful World"

Posted - 04/14/2007 :  12:07:07  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
x

Edited by - Shiv on 04/14/2007 22:46:26
Go to Top of Page

RockGolf 
"1500+ reviews. 1 joke."

Posted - 04/14/2007 :  12:23:00  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Bafta: Change your review to "...besides moneylenders from temples." and I bet it'll pass. The ellipse implies it's an extention of the title. Love the review but I needed your explanation in the form you wrote it.
Go to Top of Page

Whippersnapper. 
"A fourword thinking guy."

Posted - 04/14/2007 :  12:27:18  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by BaftaBabe

quote:
Originally posted by Shiv

I joined the crowd writing a fwfr for What Would Jesus Drive?
My review was 'Secondhand Popemobile'. It is formatted as an answer to the title, just like the majority of the other reviews.
It was rejected without explanation.

Why a secondhand Popemobile - because he'd get it off the Pope, of course.

What do you think?



Yeah, I've got trouble figuring out exactly what's wanted here. My:
"moneylenders from temple" was declined even though I quoted Biblical chapter and verse about driving them out. I know it didn't have anything to do with cars, but I thought it was funny. But, yeah, it DIDN'T have anything to do with cars.

Did you submit with your explanation? Or did you try submitting just: Popemobile? My religion expertise is sub-basement, but isn't Jesus/God meant to be the Papa Ultima? [I may have made that up]





I've just had "George Bush from office" rejected for the 2nd time.

(Papa is masculine (even though it ends in an a), and the adjective is stressed, so it's L'Ultimo Papa )
Go to Top of Page

BaftaBaby 
"Always entranced by cinema."

Posted - 04/14/2007 :  12:38:44  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by R o � k G o 7 f

Bafta: Change your review to "...besides moneylenders from temples." and I bet it'll pass. The ellipse implies it's an extention of the title. Love the review but I needed your explanation in the form you wrote it.



Ta, R o � k G o 7 f ... I'll give it a go!
Digitals crossed!

Go to Top of Page

BaftaBaby 
"Always entranced by cinema."

Posted - 04/14/2007 :  12:39:19  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Whippersnapper

quote:
Originally posted by BaftaBabe

quote:
Originally posted by Shiv

I joined the crowd writing a fwfr for What Would Jesus Drive?
My review was 'Secondhand Popemobile'. It is formatted as an answer to the title, just like the majority of the other reviews.
It was rejected without explanation.

Why a secondhand Popemobile - because he'd get it off the Pope, of course.

What do you think?



Yeah, I've got trouble figuring out exactly what's wanted here. My:
"moneylenders from temple" was declined even though I quoted Biblical chapter and verse about driving them out. I know it didn't have anything to do with cars, but I thought it was funny. But, yeah, it DIDN'T have anything to do with cars.

Did you submit with your explanation? Or did you try submitting just: Popemobile? My religion expertise is sub-basement, but isn't Jesus/God meant to be the Papa Ultima? [I may have made that up]





I've just had "George Bush from office" rejected for the 2nd time.

(Papa is masculine (even though it ends in an a), and the adjective is stressed, so it's L'Ultimo Papa )



Grazie, Whippersnappio

Go to Top of Page

Whippersnapper. 
"A fourword thinking guy."

Posted - 04/14/2007 :  13:50:16  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Prego, BaffaBambina.

I should add that when "papa" is feminine in Spanish, it means "potato", so while El Ultimo Papa means Jesus, saying La Ultima Papa would result in either mirth or serious injury.


Edited by - Whippersnapper. on 04/14/2007 14:03:38
Go to Top of Page

w22dheartlivie 
"Kitty Lover"

Posted - 04/14/2007 :  19:44:19  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Whippersnapper

Prego, BaffaBambina.

I should add that when "papa" is feminine in Spanish, it means "potato", so while El Ultimo Papa means Jesus, saying La Ultima Papa would result in either mirth or serious injury.


I'm still waiting for the ultimate potato.

Edited by - w22dheartlivie on 04/14/2007 19:45:09
Go to Top of Page

Downtown 
"Welcome back, Billy Buck"

Posted - 04/14/2007 :  22:41:22  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Well duh, he'd obviously take the BUS! Maybe he might buy a used van off of Craigslist once there's more than a couple Apostles.
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
The Four Word Film Review Fourum © 1999-2024 benj clews Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000