The Four Word Film Review Fourum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Return to my fwfr
Frequently Asked Questions Click for advanced search
 All Forums
 FWFR Related
 Reviews
 Originality sorely lacking.
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 4

RockGolf 
"1500+ reviews. 1 joke."

Posted - 08/14/2007 :  20:26:01  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I thought my line for "Frequently Asked Questions About Time Travel" was entirely original. Turns out it's not, as a Google search indicated.

Anyone else been disappointed to find their wildly clever review already existed elsewhere?

w22dheartlivie 
"Kitty Lover"

Posted - 08/14/2007 :  20:50:19  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by R o � k G o 7 f

I thought my line for "Frequently Asked Questions About Time Travel" was entirely original. Turns out it's not, as a Google search indicated.

Anyone else been disappointed to find their wildly clever review already existed elsewhere?



Oh yeah. But it doesn't mean it wasn't an original thought to you. These things always reminds me of the old "million monkeys typing for a million years and producing Shakespeare" thing. There comes a point when nothing is new - music, literature - because the notes or the words are finite.
Go to Top of Page

zulu 
"Resisting the Bay lobotomy"

Posted - 08/14/2007 :  20:59:35  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
All too frequently!

For example, for 'What would Jesus drive?'(2005) I immediately thought of "A covertible", but it was promptly rejected as too similar to another review. For the record, Baftababe's top slot review for that film is superbly original and I love it!
Go to Top of Page

BaftaBaby 
"Always entranced by cinema."

Posted - 08/14/2007 :  21:29:43  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by zulu

All too frequently!

For example, for 'What would Jesus drive?'(2005) I immediately thought of "A covertible", but it was promptly rejected as too similar to another review. For the record, Baftababe's top slot review for that film is superbly original and I love it!




Go to Top of Page

chazbo 
"Outta This Fuckin' Place"

Posted - 08/14/2007 :  22:07:04  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by zulu


For example, for 'What would Jesus drive?'(2005) I immediately thought of "A covertible", but it was promptly rejected as too similar to another review.


Funny. I also submitted "A convert-ible" for that film and had it rejected without explanation. And I couldn't find another review similar to it, so I thought it might have been too generic.

I also had "Salvation wagon" pending, but I finally gave up and deleted it.

Go to Top of Page

TitanPa 
"Here four more"

Posted - 08/14/2007 :  22:13:48  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by R o � k G o 7 f

I thought my line for "Frequently Asked Questions About Time Travel" was entirely original. Turns out it's not, as a Google search indicated.

Anyone else been disappointed to find their wildly clever review already existed elsewhere?



At least your the first Fwiffer with the review.

I am eagerly anticipating this movie.
Go to Top of Page

Yukon 
"Co-editor of FWFR book"

Posted - 08/15/2007 :  02:11:37  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I was really proud of my Birth of a Nation review: "The Empire Strikes Blacks."

Then about a year later, I came across this review for Zulu by Chilliblade.

It took the wind out of my sails because I thought mine was an original review.
Go to Top of Page

Downtown 
"Welcome back, Billy Buck"

Posted - 08/15/2007 :  04:25:34  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by R o � k G o 7 f


Anyone else been disappointed to find their wildly clever review already existed elsewhere?



Nope.

That doesn't mean it hasn't happened, I just don't let myself be disappointed about it.
Go to Top of Page

Ali 
"Those aren't pillows."

Posted - 08/15/2007 :  07:14:47  Show Profile  Reply with Quote

It happens to me sometimes. If I am particularly proud of a duplicate review (on a different film), I usually let it stay, while not calling any attention to it by entering it into FYCTH or other similar vote-hawking topics. Otherwise, I just delete them.
Go to Top of Page

ChocolateLady 
"500 Chocolate Delights"

Posted - 08/15/2007 :  08:06:41  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I only recently found out that my review Boleyn for Concubine for the movie Anne of a Thousand Days was previously used by Tequila Mockingbird for the movie Henry VIII And His Six Wives.

(I haven't heard back yet from Tequila if he (she) thinks I should remove my review or not.)

Edited by - ChocolateLady on 08/15/2007 08:07:53
Go to Top of Page

Downtown 
"Welcome back, Billy Buck"

Posted - 08/15/2007 :  14:07:45  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by ChocolateLady

I only recently found out that my review Boleyn for Concubine for the movie Anne of a Thousand Days was previously used by Tequila Mockingbird for the movie Henry VIII And His Six Wives.





I got the impression that Rock was drawing a distinction between finding your review elsewhere on this website, and finding it outside the context of the FWFR entirely. Your experience - and the decision whether or not to keep your review - is more of a dilemma than what he's describing.

Personally, I have no issues at all with clever reviews that somehow existed elsewhere. I've actually freely taken other material and used it for reviews, including Mad Magazine "department" headings and newspaper headlines (I'll never say which movies I used them for, but maybe someone can spot them). Even if one didn't coin the phrase, they were still the one who realized "wow, that would be a great FWFR," and that counts for something. In Rock's case, it's even simpler...he did make it up himself, he just didn't make it up first. So what's the problem? I don't think there is one. And it's a good review, it makes me laugh and I'd hate for it to disappear.

Edited by - Downtown on 08/15/2007 14:08:27
Go to Top of Page

Yukon 
"Co-editor of FWFR book"

Posted - 08/15/2007 :  14:33:55  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Downtown

quote:
Originally posted by ChocolateLady

I only recently found out that my review Boleyn for Concubine for the movie Anne of a Thousand Days was previously used by Tequila Mockingbird for the movie Henry VIII And His Six Wives.





I got the impression that Rock was drawing a distinction between finding your review elsewhere on this website, and finding it outside the context of the FWFR entirely. Your experience - and the decision whether or not to keep your review - is more of a dilemma than what he's describing.

Personally, I have no issues at all with clever reviews that somehow existed elsewhere. I've actually freely taken other material and used it for reviews, including Mad Magazine "department" headings and newspaper headlines (I'll never say which movies I used them for, but maybe someone can spot them). Even if one didn't coin the phrase, they were still the one who realized "wow, that would be a great FWFR," and that counts for something. In Rock's case, it's even simpler...he did make it up himself, he just didn't make it up first. So what's the problem? I don't think there is one. And it's a good review, it makes me laugh and I'd hate for it to disappear.



I remember when I was proud of my You, Me and Dupree review "Dupree's a crowd."
I was even more proud to discover that one of the taglines for the movie. was "Two's company. Dupree's a crowd."
But then I was surprised when it was rejected, and surprised again when it was submitted and approved by Tori.
Oh well.

Edited by - Yukon on 08/15/2007 14:36:33
Go to Top of Page

Demisemicenturian 
"Four ever European"

Posted - 08/15/2007 :  14:38:55  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Yukon

I remember when I was proud of my You, Me and Dupree review "Dupree's a crowd."
I was even more proud to discover that one of the taglines for the movie. was "Two's company. Dupree's a crowd."
But then I was surprised when it was rejected, and surprised again when it was submitted and approved by Tori.

Those sort of taglines should never be allowed, with the possible exception of reviews submitted before any such marketing has been created.
Go to Top of Page

duh 
"catpurrs"

Posted - 08/15/2007 :  15:12:53  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by R o � k G o 7 f

I thought my line for "Frequently Asked Questions About Time Travel" was entirely original. Turns out it's not, as a Google search indicated.

Anyone else been disappointed to find their wildly clever review already existed elsewhere?



No, because if I didn't swipe ideas find inspiration elsewhere, I wouldn't have any reviews at all.
Go to Top of Page

duh 
"catpurrs"

Posted - 08/15/2007 :  15:19:22  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by zulu

All too frequently!

For example, for 'What would Jesus drive?'(2005) I immediately thought of "A covertible", but it was promptly rejected as too similar to another review. For the record, Baftababe's top slot review for that film is superbly original and I love it!



I think you should resubmit that one. I don't see any on that page that look the same. Yours is very funny.
Go to Top of Page

Downtown 
"Welcome back, Billy Buck"

Posted - 08/15/2007 :  17:01:33  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian

quote:
Originally posted by Yukon

I remember when I was proud of my You, Me and Dupree review "Dupree's a crowd."
I was even more proud to discover that one of the taglines for the movie. was "Two's company. Dupree's a crowd."
But then I was surprised when it was rejected, and surprised again when it was submitted and approved by Tori.

Those sort of taglines should never be allowed, with the possible exception of reviews submitted before any such marketing has been created.



Yeah, that's a little different...a headline written by a newspaper editor for a movie review - something I admit to "stealing" - is a little different than the marketing campaign of the actual movie. Borrowing taglines is dangerously close to quoting the movie itself. But if you can honestly say you thought of it before the studio did, go for it!
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 4 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
The Four Word Film Review Fourum © 1999-2024 benj clews Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000