| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
Demisemicenturian 
"Four ever European"
|
 Posted - 09/18/2007 : 14:17:30
|
Benj, is there any possibility of a different kind of system for submitting corrections that do not fall within reporting reviews? At the moment, a lot seem to slip through the net. Could there be some kind of list, where you tick them off when you have processed them?  |
|
|
benj clews 
"...."
|
Posted - 09/19/2007 : 00:54:29
|
I'm not sure there are any slipping though the net- I've just not been in a good position to review them for the last few months and there's now a backlog of some 1500 to go through  |
 |
|
|
TitanPa
"Here four more"
|
Posted - 09/19/2007 : 04:23:51
|
| Do we now need a report cap? To supress all those editors out there and people looking for a bad review? |
|
|
|
Demisemicenturian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 09/19/2007 : 09:09:53
|
quote:
Originally posted by benj clews
I'm not sure there are any slipping though the net
They definitely seem to, which is why I need to bump them in threads all the time - you have often corrected some later ones but not some earlier ones. (I think you may think I am talking about reported reviews, but as you can see from my post I am specifically not talking about them.) This is no criticism of you - it is very hard with going through threads to be sure that you have acted on all new posts. There are some duplicate films that were reported months and months ago, for example (i.e. it wasn't due to your honeymoon, during which I wouldn't have expected you to correct any such cases). |
|
|
|
Demisemicenturian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 09/19/2007 : 09:11:57
|
quote:
Originally posted by TitanPa
Do we now need a report cap? To supress all those editors out there and people looking for a bad review?
Um, no. Who are these people you imagine are looking for bad reviews? Even I report very few reviews. Even if people were doing this (which I find extremely unlikely), if a review's bad, it's bad. |
|
|
|
benj clews
"...."
|
Posted - 09/19/2007 : 20:09:12
|
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
quote:
Originally posted by benj clews
I'm not sure there are any slipping though the net
They definitely seem to, which is why I need to bump them in threads all the time - you have often corrected some later ones but not some earlier ones. (I think you may think I am talking about reported reviews, but as you can see from my post I am specifically not talking about them.) This is no criticism of you - it is very hard with going through threads to be sure that you have acted on all new posts. There are some duplicate films that were reported months and months ago, for example (i.e. it wasn't due to your honeymoon, during which I wouldn't have expected you to correct any such cases).
Sorry- I misunderstood the question.
So you mean some kind of system for reporting dupe films or wrong titles or whatnot?
Dupes I've been purposefully avoiding for the last several months certainly- I don't have a browser-based admin page for doing that and I didn't want to connect to the fwfr server from a virus-riddden internet cafe. I thought I was pretty much on top of them prior to then though? |
|
|
|
Demisemicenturian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 09/20/2007 : 12:41:32
|
Yes, that's what I mean. It could still be part of the Fourum or similar, but it would help a lot if things that had been dealt with could be ticked or greyed out or something.
I knew that you couldn't do these things while you were away; sorry, I forgot that you were still not sorted for the Internet at home.
Ones that have been kicking around for ages are I think Catch a Fire, Catch and Release etc. It's always been the case that ones have slipped through and I've had to bump the posts - it would just be much more efficient if there were an unambiguous way of marking items as having been dealt with. |
|
|
| |
Topic |
|
Site maintenance system
