The Four Word Film Review Fourum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Return to my fwfr
Frequently Asked Questions Click for advanced search
 All Forums
 FWFR Related
 Reviews
 Which review shall I delete?
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

Demisemicenturian 
"Four ever European"

Posted - 01/08/2008 :  12:20:56  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I often submit variant reviews because I am not sure which one I like best, meaning to delete one later although often i become too attached to both/all to go through with it. Normally, they are different enough to (just about) justify their dual/multiple existence, but not in this case. In fact, I think I submitted the second one at the same time as resubmitting the first one, in case that again did not get through.

Which shall I retain? The first is closer (indeed, identical) to the phrase I am punning on, while the second is a full grammatical* sentence and thus clearer in terms of the real meaning.

*O.K., more grammatical, since tops is a transitive verb.

Edited by - Demisemicenturian on 01/08/2008 12:30:28

benj clews 
"...."

Posted - 01/08/2008 :  12:23:09  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Keep the first one. It's shorter, snappier, funnier.
Go to Top of Page

ChocolateLady 
"500 Chocolate Delights"

Posted - 01/08/2008 :  12:24:11  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I like "Carrot tops" better (although I might have put a comma in).
Go to Top of Page

Demisemicenturian 
"Four ever European"

Posted - 01/08/2008 :  12:28:41  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by ChocolateLady

I might have put a comma in.

It wouldn't then make any sense.

Yes, that was my original preference (hence my first submission), but I had started to think that it was just too incomprehensible without seeing the film. Assuming others think the same as you/early me, I'll report the second (as I'm also assuming that it was not the same person who voted for them both).

Edited by - Demisemicenturian on 01/08/2008 12:29:08
Go to Top of Page

benj clews 
"...."

Posted - 01/08/2008 :  12:37:32  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian

quote:
Originally posted by ChocolateLady

I might have put a comma in.

It wouldn't then make any sense.

Yes, that was my original preference (hence my first submission), but I had started to think that it was just too incomprehensible without seeing the film. Assuming others think the same as you/early me, I'll report the second (as I'm also assuming that it was not the same person who voted for them both).



I don't believe anyone seriously comes to this site to read fwfrs on films they haven't seen. I'd say the majority of submissions here rely on you having seen the film, so don't let someone not having seen the film affect your decision.
Go to Top of Page

Yukon 
"Co-editor of FWFR book"

Posted - 01/08/2008 :  12:48:51  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I'm with Benj.

Shorter is almost almost better. Go with two words over three.
Go to Top of Page

Whippersnapper. 
"A fourword thinking guy."

Posted - 01/08/2008 :  13:16:34  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Yukon

Shorter is almost almost better.



My "irony detection alarm" just started beeping.




Go to Top of Page

Ali 
"Those aren't pillows."

Posted - 01/08/2008 :  13:30:38  Show Profile  Reply with Quote

Keep the first one.
Go to Top of Page

w22dheartlivie 
"Kitty Lover"

Posted - 01/08/2008 :  16:26:22  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I wouldn't use the article, go with Carrot tops.
Go to Top of Page

Cheese_Ed 
"The Provolone Ranger"

Posted - 01/08/2008 :  18:18:02  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I get that it's a play on Carrot Top (one of the world's finest comedians ) but the review doesn't make much sense to me in the context of the film. OK, the protagonist eats carrots and uses then as weapons a couple times, how is that equal to the carrot topping something or somebody?

How about "Carrot stops."? The play on words is weaker but it makes more sense for the film.
Go to Top of Page

Demisemicenturian 
"Four ever European"

Posted - 01/08/2008 :  19:12:37  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Never heard of Carrot Top. It's a play on carrot tops (redheads). I'm not quite clear on you agreeing that the carrot is used as a weapon, but disagreeing that it is used to top someone. Do you think that the person attacked with the carrot survives? I cannot now remember, but at the time of submission I was reasonably sure that that was not the case.
Go to Top of Page

BaftaBaby 
"Always entranced by cinema."

Posted - 01/08/2008 :  19:21:13  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian

Never heard of Carrot Top. It's a play on carrot tops (redheads). I'm not quite clear on you agreeing that the carrot is used as a weapon, but disagreeing that it is used to top someone. Do you think that the person attacked with the carrot survives? I cannot now remember, but at the time of submission I was reasonably sure that that was not the case.



I agree, Sal - but I'm also not sure the Americans know that to top someone means to kill them. I also agree that Carrot Tops is the more succint of the two. And that's it's a spot on review!

Go to Top of Page

Yukon 
"Co-editor of FWFR book"

Posted - 01/08/2008 :  20:28:57  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by BaftaBabe

quote:
Originally posted by Salopian

Never heard of Carrot Top. It's a play on carrot tops (redheads). I'm not quite clear on you agreeing that the carrot is used as a weapon, but disagreeing that it is used to top someone. Do you think that the person attacked with the carrot survives? I cannot now remember, but at the time of submission I was reasonably sure that that was not the case.



I agree, Sal - but I'm also not sure the Americans know that to top someone means to kill them. I also agree that Carrot Tops is the more succint of the two. And that's it's a spot on review!






Top means to kill somebody? Canadians didn't know that either. The review seems a lot more clever now knowing that.
Go to Top of Page

RockGolf 
"1500+ reviews. 1 joke."

Posted - 01/08/2008 :  21:57:53  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Topper was a hitman?
Go to Top of Page

turrell 
"Ohhhh Ohhhh Ohhhh Ohhhh "

Posted - 01/08/2008 :  22:43:56  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
What about your beloved "Top of the Pops" is that what they're doing to Britney?
Go to Top of Page

Cheese_Ed 
"The Provolone Ranger"

Posted - 01/08/2008 :  22:48:22  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
To top means to kill? Well that tops it.

Off the top of my head I would have said, "Orange you mistaken?"

But I just looked in the Compact Oxford and if you carrot all here's the definition:

� verb (topped, topping) 1 be more, better, or taller than. 2 be at the highest place or rank in. 3 reach the top of (a hill, rise, etc.). 4 (usu. be topped) provide with a top or topping. 5 informal kill. 6 Golf mishit (the ball) by hitting above the centre of the ball.



You da man, Sal.





Now, if only there was a redhead in the film.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
The Four Word Film Review Fourum © 1999-2024 benj clews Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000