1. I saw this film a few days ago but have been tardy in posting a review because A} It was so awesome and profound I needed to take time for it to filter through every pore of my being
B} I've been caught in an emotional net of joy and tears and unable to function
C} It was such a piece of predictable corny dreck I just can't find the energy to address it properly
2. True or Falsies: Any rom-com starring Kate Hudson vies for Bad Choice of the Year over and above the last one she did, whatever it happened to be
3. Is there some troglodyte cave clan hiding out along the Charles River where no one speaks with a Bostonian accent, and everyone's emotional development has been arrested somewhere around the age of 6
4. Have I spent enough time on this linty piece of crap and how dare the filmmakers - including 11 count 'em E-FUCKING-LEVEN producers who are ALL MEN - how dare they present a chick flick that has nothing to do with what women want as though all women want the same thing anyway and ... snore snore snore snore NO, I'm not sleeping I'm just so kerplunking bored
My advice - if you must see this, this ... thing ... please do yourself a favour and get a lobotomy first.
Got to agree. What's-his-name had some charm in Good Luck Fuck, but this was just tiresome. Kate Hudson must be much better as a person than an actress if she was good enough for Owen Wilson.
I've seen about 275 so far at the cinema this year. Are you sure I wasn't talking about on D.V.D.? That rings a bell and would be about right for times when I am not with LoveFilm.
Edited by - Demisemicenturian on 01/19/2009 00:43:34
3. Is there some troglodyte cave clan hiding out along the Charles River where no one speaks with a Bostonian accent, and everyone's emotional development has been arrested somewhere around the age of 6?