| Author |
 Topic  |
|
RockGolf 
"1500+ reviews. 1 joke."
|
 Posted - 05/25/2009 : 14:27:30
|
At one time the only 3-letter review on the site that I knew of was noncentz's review of Jaws IV.
But this week I've found new 3-letter reviews from Krugerbait and Demonic (part of brilliant trilogy, D, which I hope you'll keep together in your FYC this week).
Have I missed any other 3-character wonders? |
|
|
randall 
"I like to watch."
|
Posted - 05/25/2009 : 15:00:08
|
| Long ago, I had a one-character wonder, which I still think works in a liberal sense. However, it was judged a decline, and I think I know why: because it would have caused a huge commotion in this very Fourum. However, *I'm* still a fan. benj, or whomever declined it, knows exactly what I'm talking about. |
 |
|
|
[matt]
"Cinemattic."
|
Posted - 05/25/2009 : 15:28:49
|
Does punctuation count as a letter?
If it doesn't, then I have my first 3 letter review.
|
|
|
|
randall
"I like to watch."
|
Posted - 05/25/2009 : 16:22:53
|
quote:
Originally posted by [matt]
Does punctuation count as a letter?
If it doesn't, then I have my first 3 letter review.
I think you're looking at a four-*character* review there [the period at the end doesn't count], but that's still damn good! |
|
|
|
[matt]
"Cinemattic."
|
Posted - 05/25/2009 : 16:48:51
|
Oh ok yeah. Nearly then!
Cheers 
I'm determined to do a 3-letter now.
|
|
|
|
demonic 
"Cinemaniac"
|
Posted - 05/25/2009 : 18:33:46
|
Thanks very much Rockgolf - I was pleased when I managed to work out reviews for all three - but especially pleased with "Red" because of the 3 character review... I will be FYC them together - not sure when yet, got a few to show. |
|
|
|
clay 
"Viewer discretion is revised."
|
Posted - 05/25/2009 : 18:56:28
|
If "The Life of Brian Singer" is ever made, I'm ready with "BS." And if "The Minimalist" is ever made, I'm ready with " ."
|
|
|
|
demonic
"Cinemaniac"
|
|
|
Sean
"Necrosphenisciform anthropophagist."
|
Posted - 05/25/2009 : 22:58:02
|
| The 2nd review here is two characters if you don't count the space. |
|
|
|
Demisemicenturian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 05/26/2009 : 18:05:33
|
I have just come on to post that very thread, so thanks demonic.
Another two-letter one by bife is here, although it is good by accident as he didn't know that that is the name of a famous British television strand.
I tried to get "!" through for The Dot and the Line, and still think it's valid (a dot and a line falling in love being very surprising). |
|
|
|
Demisemicenturian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 05/26/2009 : 18:07:34
|
quote:
Originally posted by randall
Long ago, I had a one-character wonder, which I still think works in a liberal sense. However, it was judged a decline, and I think I know why: because it would have caused a huge commotion in this very Fourum. However, *I'm* still a fan. benj, or whomever declined it, knows exactly what I'm talking about.
Was it you who submitted "A" for The Scarlet Letter? |
|
|
|
lemmycaution
"Long mired in film"
|
Posted - 05/26/2009 : 20:29:30
|
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
quote:
Originally posted by randall
Long ago, I had a one-character wonder, which I still think works in a liberal sense. However, it was judged a decline, and I think I know why: because it would have caused a huge commotion in this very Fourum. However, *I'm* still a fan. benj, or whomever declined it, knows exactly what I'm talking about.
Was it you who submitted "A" for The Scarlet Letter?
If there ever is a Canadian version of Hawthorne's romance, I have dibs on "'A' eh!". |
|
|
|
rockfsh
"Laugh, Love, Cheer"
|
|
|
Kruegerbait 
"Not known as Joss"
|
Posted - 05/27/2009 : 02:16:29
|
| Nice spot Rockgolf, until you mentioned this I hadn't even realised that two of the reviews I entered this week are both my first ever 3 character and 4 character reviews. |
Edited by - Kruegerbait on 05/27/2009 02:17:27 |
|
|
|
ci�nas
"hands down"
|
Posted - 05/28/2009 : 12:41:58
|
| With mild apologies to Se�n, I�ve just had �O3.� accepted for The Ring 3 (as yet unmade). Could be considered semi-plagiaristic, no doubt, although I did think of �O2.� (no space) independently but too late. Subscript assumed, O3 is of course the ozone molecule, so I suppose there�s a vague pun there if you allow that all the remakes & sequels could be said to constitute an O zone. |
|
|
|
Yukon
"Co-editor of FWFR book"
|
Posted - 05/29/2009 : 04:11:20
|
One of my favourite reviews on the site is this one:
XxX (2002): "ZZZ." |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
Wee
