The Four Word Film Review Fourum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Return to my fwfr
Frequently Asked Questions Click for advanced search
 All Forums
 FWFR Related
 Reviews
 Seán's FYCTH - #659
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 3

Demisemicenturian 
"Four ever European"

Posted - 11/05/2010 :  17:08:22  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Choco11ateLady

I'm Back!

Glad to hear it. I was sorry not to see you here when I came back a couple of weeks ago.
Go to Top of Page

clay 
"Viewer discretion is revised."

Posted - 11/05/2010 :  17:21:04  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Choco11ateLady

I'm Back!



Sweet!
Go to Top of Page

lemmycaution 
"Long mired in film"

Posted - 11/05/2010 :  21:24:17  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Welcome back! Glad to see the numbers increasing.
Go to Top of Page

Demisemicenturian 
"Four ever European"

Posted - 11/06/2010 :  17:19:48  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by 11Babe

Someone named this French donkey Balthazar. Ain't Eddie Murphy jealous! Uhm ... non!

There's more disporting than sport on that beach.

Excellent ones.
Go to Top of Page

Demisemicenturian 
"Four ever European"

Posted - 11/06/2010 :  17:52:37  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by demonXIc

Ron Cook plays Richard in the BBC "Richard III"

It's weird that that has been allowed to stay. Benj deleted a lot of made-for-television Shakespeare adaptations a while back. Unlike some people around here, I recognise that T.V. films are films and so should stay on the site, but if some are removed then I don't understand why others in the same category aren't. The only (weak) basis for bias against some could be that there wasn't enough information on the I.M.D.B. for reviewing, but any Shakespeare adaptation with a cast list can extremely easily be reviewed.
Go to Top of Page

ChocolateLady 
"500 Chocolate Delights"

Posted - 11/07/2010 :  09:35:16  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Bi11erBoat

Monsieur Hulot's in for this one.



5/5 from me!
Go to Top of Page

Larry 
"Larry's time / sat merrily"

Posted - 11/07/2010 :  12:06:45  Show Profile  Reply with Quote

Viewted.
Go to Top of Page

lemmycaution 
"Long mired in film"

Posted - 11/07/2010 :  15:05:25  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Yep.
Go to Top of Page

randall 
"I like to watch."

Posted - 11/07/2010 :  15:51:47  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by demonXIc

True tales... well, true-ish.


Funny, they don't look true-ish!

V&V.

Sensei, thank you for pointing me to centz's great accolade.
Go to Top of Page

clay 
"Viewer discretion is revised."

Posted - 11/07/2010 :  20:59:53  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
vv
Go to Top of Page

BaftaBaby 
"Always entranced by cinema."

Posted - 11/07/2010 :  21:15:22  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
ValsoV

Go to Top of Page

demonic 
"Cinemaniac"

Posted - 11/07/2010 :  21:35:28  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Veed. Great stuff from Bigger Boat this round. Bravi.
Go to Top of Page

demonic 
"Cinemaniac"

Posted - 11/07/2010 :  21:47:13  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Cracovian
It's weird that that has been allowed to stay. Benj deleted a lot of made-for-television Shakespeare adaptations a while back. Unlike some people around here, I recognise that T.V. films are films and so should stay on the site, but if some are removed then I don't understand why others in the same category aren't. The only (weak) basis for bias against some could be that there wasn't enough information on the I.M.D.B. for reviewing, but any Shakespeare adaptation with a cast list can extremely easily be reviewed.



I can't comment on what made-for-TV Shakespeare's may have been previously deleted as I haven't noticed or missed them, but it's easy to see that all of the BBC produced ones (basically the gold standard for Shakespeare on film during the 70s and 80s) are still on the system, and should be. There are a large number of Shakespeare adaptations that don't deserve to be though - for example numerous home made versions never released in any format that proliferate on IMDB as they are added by their creators to enhance their own credits. Like you I have no issue with made for TV, but I've got a big problem with made for showreel.
Go to Top of Page

[matt] 
"Cinemattic."

Posted - 11/07/2010 :  22:56:44  Show Profile  Reply with Quote

I'm also back... from 2 days at Disneyland!

Hence why I couldn't enter this round. V+V anyway.

quote:
Originally posted by demonXIc

Great stuff from Bigger Boat this round. Bravi.


Agreed, and also from yourself.

Go to Top of Page

demonic 
"Cinemaniac"

Posted - 11/08/2010 :  00:37:24  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Thanks [matt], and welcome back too.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 3 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
The Four Word Film Review Fourum © 1999-2024 benj clews Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000