The Four Word Film Review Fourum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Return to my fwfr
Frequently Asked Questions Click for advanced search
 All Forums
 Film Related
 Films
 J. Edgar
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

randall 
"I like to watch."

Posted - 11/09/2011 :  02:41:34  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Clint Eastwood�s new film is held earthbound by the weight of its central character and the one-note nature of his frightening decades-long megalomania. Most people who remember J. Edgar Hoover do so through a veil of scorn. His paranoia and Commie-hatred made Dick Cheney look like Emma Goldman [as one of Hoover�s early victims, she is portrayed in the film], and he only met his match in ruthlessness the day Richard Nixon ascended to the White House.

Leonardo DiCaprio seizes one more chance to prove he�s an actor to reckon with, but the part lets him down. Though he never falters in the role, there is so little change in Hoover that his portrayal lacks color [as does Eastwood�s palette, all distressed-looking blues and grays]. This man was a bundle of stress and insecurity when he first arrived at Justice, and he never came close to working any of it out. The showier character is Hoover�s �companion� Clyde Tolson, played by Armie Hammer of THE SOCIAL NETWORK. The screenplay by Dustin Lance Black [MILK] is unstinting when viewing their much-speculated-about relationship, but makes neither man into a cartoon. Even the most notorious rumor about Hoover is visually depicted, but in a way that proceeds organically out of the story.

The worst thing about this movie is the awful old-age makeup, which we�re required to stare at for much too long. DiCaprio looks like a cross between a decrepit Jon Voight and Philip Seymour Hoffman. Hammer is simply ghastly as an old man, like a reanimated character out of a horror movie. Only Naomi Watts as Hoover�s longtime secretary appears to age gracefully.

Eastwood�s directorial hand is solid as always, nearly invisible. It�s the subject matter which lacks transcendence. Hoover�s own memory and self-aggrandizement [he is ostensibly dictating his life story] are challenged in a revelatory speech by Tolson toward the end; so much about the man has been secreted away that all we have left is something that most resembles an Oliver Stone take. Worth seeing, but not worth saving.

Edited by - randall on 11/09/2011 22:54:46

ChocolateLady 
"500 Chocolate Delights"

Posted - 11/09/2011 :  12:21:14  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
And, from the clips I've seen so far, DiCaprio continues to scowl through each and every scene he's in.

[Sigh]I don't think I can handle seeing that... again![/Sigh]
Go to Top of Page

Sludge 
"Charlie Don't Serf!"

Posted - 11/14/2011 :  16:55:20  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I really liked this film.

quote:
The worst thing about this movie is the awful old-age makeup


Agreed, especially as I was sitting in Row E last night. Also the scowl you're seeing in the clips is not a facial expression, but permanently fixed by the make up crew. I just kept staring between the eyebrows wondering if it would ever move.

For me, this was one of DiCaprio's best performances. I think Eastwood did a masterful job handling the elephant in the rumors.

Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
The Four Word Film Review Fourum © 1999-2024 benj clews Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000