| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Mr Savoir Faire |
Posted - 03/22/2007 : 00:09:45
I can't help but notice that many films on the now playing list are reviewless. 300 had only one review until three days ago.
I'm not complaining about this, I just have an idea.
When I first saw this site I immediately searched for reviews on the films I had just seen, most of which were on the top ten charts. I assume many people do this when they discover fwfr. Anyway, I believe that if current movies playing had precedence in the review queue then more people would be attracted to the site.
Any thoughts?
|
| 4 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| TitanPa |
Posted - 03/23/2007 : 15:21:10
He's been gone how long? And already giving out requests?
|
| w22dheartlivie |
Posted - 03/22/2007 : 04:46:18
I think that's true sometimes, but in a lot of cases, it seems the most obvious puns, etc., come quickly. Sometimes inspiration comes from the buzz around upcoming films too. For me, I actually don't go to the theater, so I tend to review what I'm seeing at home. (Of course, that's a scary thought, looking at the reviews I've written lately.) One thing I often do is hop over to IMDB when I see ads on TV for new films, thus the recent reviews for 300. I do agree that it seems reviews for newer films get processed quicker, for the same reasons mentioned above. |
| MisterBadIdea |
Posted - 03/22/2007 : 03:49:07
You gotta keep in mind, man, people have got to see the film before they can start cracking jokes on it. People have to sit and think on them before a while before they've come up with a decent FWFR. |
| Yukon |
Posted - 03/22/2007 : 02:16:04
I think that already happens.
I often review new movies and notice they get added to the site quicker than other films. |
|
|
