The Four Word Film Review Fourum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Return to my fwfr
Frequently Asked Questions Click for advanced search
 All Forums
 FWFR Related
 Reviews
 Odd <Click for details> - Thoughts Please

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert Email Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

Smilies
Angry [:(!] Approve [^] Big Smile [:D] Black Eye [B)]
Blush [:I] Clown [:o)] Cool [8D] Dead [xx(]
Disapprove [V] Duh [7] Eight Ball [8] Evil [}:)]
Gulp [12] Hog [13] Kisses [:X] LOL [15]
Moon [1] Nerd [18] Question [?] Sad [:(]
Shock [:O] Shy [8)] Skull [20] Sleepy [|)]
Smile [:)] Tongue [:P] Wink [;)] Yawn [29]

   -  HTML is OFF | Forum Code is ON
 
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
MM0rkeleb Posted - 09/14/2008 : 18:27:37
So I just had a couple of rejections I want to talk about. I've got no beef with the rejections themselves; I can see why the reviews might need to be adjusted to be acceptable. However, each rejection came with an additional explanation that puzzled me.

First up is Chimes at Midnight, Orson Welles's condensation of a few Shakespeare plays focusing on the relationship between Henry IV and Falstaff. I submitted 'You Orson round man!' a reference to a line in I Henry IV where Falstaff is called 'you whoreson round man.' Admittedly, the link to Henry IV is tenuous since it's not a famous line, so it's a little generic as is (I already know how I want to modify it). Here's what the MERP said:

Nice pun, but not only for this movie...for example, 'Touch of Evil', and anything in Welles' latter, fatter period (even 'Start the Revolution Without Me'). 'Henry IV' is only part of the source.

It's the bolded part that confuses me. Why is it relevant that Chimes at Midnight has sources other than Henry IV?

The other review is for Sweet Smell of Success. Given the well-known scene where Lancaster tells Curtis 'Match me, Sidney,' I thought I'd try 'Lancaster matched by Curtis.' Here's what the MERP said:

You review could apply to three out of the four films in which these two actors appear together. Could you please resubmit a review more specific for this film. Thank you.

Now, if it weren't for the specificity of the bolded part, I'd assume the MERP had missed the match pun. So is it the case that in three of these four films (I'm assuming all but the last):

Criss Cross
Trapeze
The Sweet Smell of Success
The List of Adrian Messenger

Curtis lights a match for Lancaster? Or should I resubmit with explanation?

15   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
MguyXXV Posted - 09/16/2008 : 05:49:09
quote:
Originally posted by demonic

Livie - I was going to mention classical pieces composed in C flat-major, but figured that was a tad too retentive as well.

Hmmm. Here's a thought - by association MGuyX should find my musical knowledge a turn-on too...

No, but oddly, it does relieve me of that gassy bloated feeling.

demonic Posted - 09/16/2008 : 02:34:51
Livie - I was going to mention classical pieces composed in C flat-major, but figured that was a tad too retentive as well.

Hmmm. Here's a thought - by association MGuyX should find my musical knowledge a turn-on too...
lemmycaution Posted - 09/16/2008 : 01:57:26
quote:
Originally posted by wildheartlivie

quote:
Originally posted by MguyX

I find your knowledge of music esoterica fascinating livie. It's kind of a turn on.



Aw shucks. You should see my Rickenbacker hollow body guitar. I had a nearly complete college minor in piano. But hey...



Rickenbacker!!! Wow!!!
Whippersnapper. Posted - 09/15/2008 : 22:16:25
quote:
Originally posted by demonic

While we're chatting I had a recent decline that I thought was a little unfair given how precise the MERP was being given what a nice pun it was...

For "Blithe Spirit" my review was 'Corpse Brides' (because Rex Harrison's character is haunted by his dead wives). The MERPish reason was "Spirits yes, corpses no". Is that being a tad too literal, or is it just me?




How dispiriting!





w22dheartlivie Posted - 09/15/2008 : 21:54:07
quote:
Originally posted by MguyX

I find your knowledge of music esoterica fascinating livie. It's kind of a turn on.



Aw shucks. You should see my Rickenbacker hollow body guitar. I had a nearly complete college minor in piano. But hey...
MguyXXV Posted - 09/15/2008 : 21:23:17
I find your knowledge of music esoterica fascinating livie. It's kind of a turn on.
w22dheartlivie Posted - 09/15/2008 : 04:30:31
quote:
Originally posted by demonic

Actually there is such a key as C flat, hence C flat major. B major is more commonly used because it has five sharps rather than seven flats, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.


edit: great minds, etc. Although Livie's mind was a bit quicker.



I started to go on about progressive key changes and yada yada, and realized I was lecturing too much.
demonic Posted - 09/15/2008 : 02:39:38
It's a conspiracy I tell you.
Demisemicenturian Posted - 09/15/2008 : 02:36:47
I've had the reverse today (or recently) -- I referred to someone becoming a ghost who had only become a corpse!
demonic Posted - 09/15/2008 : 02:30:33
While we're chatting I had a recent decline that I thought was a little unfair given how precise the MERP was being given what a nice pun it was...

For "Blithe Spirit" my review was 'Corpse Brides' (because Rex Harrison's character is haunted by his dead wives). The MERPish reason was "Spirits yes, corpses no". Is that being a tad too literal, or is it just me?
Demisemicenturian Posted - 09/15/2008 : 02:24:10
I should also (re)state that the reason this sort of error bothers me is that I am losing a substantial proportion of my quota having to resubmit reviews, and even so am not able to resubmit all invalidly rejected ones.

So, Benj, here is a suggestion:

If a review gets through on a non-initial pass (not counting rejections for over 20 submissions, since they do not use up quota places, or reviewers' edits of approved reviews, since the reviewer is choosing to do that (unless they are editing back from an unwanted MERP change)), give the reviewer an extra quota slot for that week. That way, people would not be disadvantaged for faulty MERP decisions.
Demisemicenturian Posted - 09/15/2008 : 02:12:27
Me too (great minds, I mean). I had just come on to say the same thing, now that I had thought about it.
demonic Posted - 09/15/2008 : 01:58:42
Actually there is such a key as C flat, hence C flat major. B major is more commonly used because it has five sharps rather than seven flats, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.


edit: great minds, etc. Although Livie's mind was a bit quicker.
w22dheartlivie Posted - 09/15/2008 : 01:54:31
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian

Here's a more specific one, for which I'll have to say my review (something I don't like doing, since then people get into discussing merits or dismerits of the review that are not relevant to the issue at hand). It is "Key, C.C., flat" for The Apartment.

Here is the response: "I get where you're trying to go with the three related puns, but there's no such key as 'C flat', and the second 'C', required for the character's name, foils the effort anyway. Noble try, but declined with regrets."

Now, I am neither ignorant of nor interested in the basics of music, so I certainly do not need a lecture about it. Benj has changed the rules such that a good pun can override inaccuracies in a review. (I don't know exactly where, but he said so in a recent thread.) This does NOT, however, mean that suddenly a bad pun cancels out a perfectly accurate review. C.C., his flat and the key to it are three of the very central things in this film. The pun not being perfect is of no relevance to approvability, only to voting.



However, the MERP is wrong. There is indeed a key of C-flat. C-flat major corresponds with B major, however it is written differently. C-flat major has 7 flats, as opposed to B major's 5 sharps. Whether it is a commonly used key signature or not, it does exist, so the rationale for declining the review based on the non-existence of the key is in error.

(Sorry for the mini-lecture, Salopian.)
Demisemicenturian Posted - 09/15/2008 : 00:17:04
Here's a more specific one, for which I'll have to say my review (something I don't like doing, since then people get into discussing merits or dismerits of the review that are not relevant to the issue at hand). It is "Key, C.C., flat" for The Apartment.

Here is the response: "I get where you're trying to go with the three related puns, but there's no such key as 'C flat', and the second 'C', required for the character's name, foils the effort anyway. Noble try, but declined with regrets."

Now, I am neither ignorant of nor interested in the basics of music, so I certainly do not need a lecture about it. Benj has changed the rules such that a good pun can override inaccuracies in a review. (I don't know exactly where, but he said so in a recent thread.) This does NOT, however, mean that suddenly a bad pun cancels out a perfectly accurate review. C.C., his flat and the key to it are three of the very central things in this film. The pun not being perfect is of no relevance to approvability, only to voting.

The Four Word Film Review Fourum © 1999-2024 benj clews Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000