| Author |
 Topic  |
|
Salopian 
"Four ever European"
|
 Posted - 09/15/2006 : 17:24:36
|
| When I wrote "Starbuck's international franchise expanded", I for some reason thought that the film came after the television series, whereas in fact it seems that it was the pilot. Benj, could I change this to "Starbuck's international franchise begun" without its being rejected for being too similar to bife's "Beginning of Starbuck's franchise"? |
 |
|
|
bife
"Winners never quit ... fwfr ... "
|
Posted - 09/15/2006 : 23:49:31
|
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
When I wrote "Starbuck's international franchise expanded", I for some reason thought that the film came after the television series, whereas in fact it seems that it was the pilot. Benj, could I change this to "Starbuck's international franchise begun" without its being rejected for being too similar to bife's "Beginning of Starbuck's franchise"?
Damn, that does look rather similar to mine - 'Beginning of Starbuck's franchise'
Yours must be first. I can't tell for sure as I've already voted on it, but since mine is new, and since I don't remember seeing or voting on yours before, I can only assume it was a while ago and was held deep in my subconscious.
I'll go do the necessary  |
|
|
|
Salopian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 09/18/2006 : 09:07:00
|
quote:
Originally posted by bife
I'll go do the necessary
You didn't need to. If benj were happy for mine to stand as it is, then they would perhaps be different enough. Anyway, I'm sure you didn't remember mine, but just thought of a similar idea independently. (By the way, re checking dates, you do know that you can just put films in chronological order, right? You only need to check the I.D. numbers when it's different films or your review has been declined.) |
Edited by - Salopian on 09/20/2006 09:05:15 |
|
|
|
Salopian
"Four ever European"
|
|
|
TitanPa
"Here four more"
|
Posted - 09/20/2006 : 17:22:31
|
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
It's not factually wrong, but I'm rather uncomfortable with "Irwin survives again... Shit!".
But it was added before the accident, right? Benj cant go back though and decide what would be right or wrong if an actor dies suddenly |
|
|
|
Salopian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 09/20/2006 : 17:36:45
|
quote:
Originally posted by TitanPa
But it was added before the accident, right? Benj cant go back though and decide what would be right or wrong if an actor dies suddenly
He can if he likes. |
|
|
|
Salopian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 09/21/2006 : 11:29:40
|
| "Arse and All?" seems to refer to (proper) football, but I assume from the other reviews that this film is about American football. |
|
|
|
Downtown 
"Welcome back, Billy Buck"
|
Posted - 09/21/2006 : 14:36:41
|
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
"Arse and All?" seems to refer to (proper) football, but I assume from the other reviews that this film is about American football.
PROPER???
I'll pretend you didn't say that.  |
|
|
|
thefoxboy 
"Four your eyes only."
|
Posted - 09/21/2006 : 21:49:14
|
quote:
Originally posted by Downtown
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
"Arse and All?" seems to refer to (proper) football, but I assume from the other reviews that this film is about American football.
PROPER???
I'll pretend you didn't say that.
I know, what was he thinking?. Australian Rules Football is PROPER footy. |
|
|
|
Downtown
"Welcome back, Billy Buck"
|
Posted - 09/21/2006 : 23:14:23
|
| Touche! |
|
|
|
thefoxboy
"Four your eyes only."
|
Posted - 09/21/2006 : 23:59:01
|
quote:
Originally posted by Downtown
Touche!
btw...Welcome back to the fourum DT. |
Edited by - thefoxboy on 09/21/2006 23:59:29 |
|
|
|
lemmycaution
"Long mired in film"
|
Posted - 09/22/2006 : 00:12:07
|
quote:
Originally posted by thefoxboy
quote:
Originally posted by Downtown
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
"Arse and All?" seems to refer to (proper) football, but I assume from the other reviews that this film is about American football.
PROPER???
I'll pretend you didn't say that.
I know, what was he thinking?. Australian Rules Football is PROPER footy.
And then there is Canadian football. |
|
|
|
Downtown
"Welcome back, Billy Buck"
|
Posted - 09/27/2006 : 00:21:51
|
Now that both Eon and John Cleese have confirmed that Q will in fact not be included in "Casino Royale," I think it's probably time to remove fox's incorrect review of that film, especially since he has an alternate review that covers the film without the character.
The possibility of my review losing its place as the top vote getter for this film is only part of the reason I'm bringing this up. 
|
|
|
|
ChocolateLady
"500 Chocolate Delights"
|
Posted - 09/27/2006 : 05:56:59
|
quote:
Originally posted by Downtown
Now that both Eon and John Cleese have confirmed that Q will in fact not be included in "Casino Royale," I think it's probably time to remove fox's incorrect review of that film, especially since he has an alternate review that covers the film without the character.
The possibility of my review losing its place as the top vote getter for this film is only part of the reason I'm bringing this up.
Agreed. And the possiblity that there are people who will realize that my (now #3 seated) review is worth more than a mere 11 votes will push my review into the top slot.
(Worth more votes because there are two meanings to "Craig gains 00 status". 1-its Craig's first film as 007 and 2-the story for this movie goes back to early Bond it's his first case after being promoted to 00 status.) |
|
|
|
demonic
"Cinemaniac"
|
Posted - 09/28/2006 : 02:24:26
|
| A clanger here. A rightly anonymous review at the bottom of the second page needs to go for reviewing the wrong part of the trilogy. There's a load of generics as well. |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
Reviews that are wrong
