| Author |
 Topic  |
|
Shiv 
"What a Wonderful World"
|
 Posted - 07/11/2007 : 01:03:51
|
Re chicks - all women are chicks in the part of the world I am living in. Old, young, attractive, unattractive. Until Sal explained it to me, I simply read the review and saw it as a statement - she was the Tory leader, she's a woman - what's the joke?
Re Thatcher's attractiveness - apparently when she was the 'new chick on the block' she was regarded as having a strange sexual attractiveness to some of the politicans in her sphere of operation. In later years, it was the power thing, I think. |
 |
|
|
Whippersnapper. 
"A fourword thinking guy."
|
Posted - 07/11/2007 : 01:11:16
|
Strange indeed.
|
|
|
|
Shiv
"What a Wonderful World"
|
Posted - 07/11/2007 : 01:11:43
|
quote:
Originally posted by BiggerBoat
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
After a long life on the site, my review "Fear Greeks bearing gifts" was recently rejected. Now, I don't think this is a good review, since it is just a quotation (albeit one which is sufficiently encompassing to represent the film), but I do object to its being rejected as 'Too generic'. Under current conditions, I think this couldn't really be considered too 'generic' even if it weren't a quotation. However, since it is (and one which refers specifically to the Wooden Horse episode of the Siege of Troy), it definitely cannot be considered so - there are not so many Troy films.
I thought it was Beware Greeks Bearing Gifts.
I believe it is the most usual form, hence one of my fave reviews Wayne's World
Edit: to give correct fwfr in link |
Edited by - Shiv on 07/14/2007 03:40:44 |
|
|
|
Demisemicenturian 
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 07/11/2007 : 09:24:31
|
quote:
Originally posted by BiggerBoat
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
After a long life on the site, my review "Fear Greeks bearing gifts" was recently rejected. Now, I don't think this is a good review, since it is just a quotation (albeit one which is sufficiently encompassing to represent the film), but I do object to its being rejected as 'Too generic'. Under current conditions, I think this couldn't really be considered too 'generic' even if it weren't a quotation. However, since it is (and one which refers specifically to the Wooden Horse episode of the Siege of Troy), it definitely cannot be considered so - there are not so many Troy films.
I thought it was Beware Greeks Bearing Gifts.
That's just an alternative translation of Timeo. (It may well be more common - I don't know - but my one is definitely valid and fits four words better.) |
Edited by - Demisemicenturian on 07/11/2007 09:27:23 |
|
|
|
Ali 
"Those aren't pillows."
|
Posted - 07/11/2007 : 09:53:08
|
There are a number of films about Troy, Salopian: Helen of Troy, The Trojan War, not to mention countless documentaries. Under the revised guidelines, the review is fine, but it wasn't when I first reported it.
It is, to this day, the only review I've ever reported and will remain that way. The reason I originally reported it, months and months and months ago, was not just because it was too generic (which it was, by the way). It was a month or so after I'd started posting on the boards, and I was taken aback by - what I considered to be - your puritannical, antagonistic and mean-spirited obsession about rules and regulations. I thought, "OK, let's see if he likes the taste of his own medicine."
Looking back, it was a knee-jerk and juvenile reaction. Firstly, because I have since come to know you, and, albeit peculiar, you are not a mean-spirited person (in fact, you are one of my favourite posters) - you just have complete courage of your convictions. Secondly, because whatever the reason, reporting a review without telling the reviewer first is akin to smelling one's dirty socks after taking them off at the end of the day. It's disgusting, and only morons do it. So I am sorry.
Anyway, as I said before, it works perfectly well under the new rules, and maybe you should resubmit your review.
|
Edited by - Ali on 07/11/2007 10:01:09 |
|
|
|
Demisemicenturian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 07/11/2007 : 10:37:57
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ali
There are a number of films about Troy, Salopian: Helen of Troy, The Trojan War, not to mention countless documentaries. Under the revised guidelines, the review is fine, but it wasn't when I first reported it.
There are not that many documentaries about it, but more importantly it would not really fit those so well, as it aligns oneself with the Trojans, which a documentary would not do. Even under the old rules, where there were a few films about a specific historical event or character (or a few films of the same book etc.), 'too generic' would not tend to apply.
quote:
I thought, "OK, let's see if he likes the taste of his own medicine."
I have got no problem with my reviews being reported where valid - this just wasn't an instance of that.
quote:
Secondly, because whatever the reason, reporting a review without telling the reviewer first is akin to smelling one's dirty socks after taking them off at the end of the day. It's disgusting, and only morons do it.
Hhmmm, I still don't agree with this sentiment. Perhaps surprisingly, I don't report many reviews, just occasional ones that should definitely be removed (except for the addition of any borderline Alan Smithee ones), and there is no point in having any discussion of those. |
Edited by - Demisemicenturian on 07/11/2007 10:39:43 |
|
|
|
Whippersnapper.
"A fourword thinking guy."
|
Posted - 07/11/2007 : 11:04:25
|
If you want to see the downside of trying to tell someone about a problem with their review (rather than just reporting it), and I don't assign any blame here, look at the recent "Mike Tyson" thread. "Foxboy Gets Ears Boxed".
I learned a long time ago how badly an honest straight-forward approach can be received by some people, so now I only raise a review problem directly with those who I feel would take it in the right spirit.
Anyone else, where appropriate, its the anonymity of the report button I'm afraid. 
|
|
|
|
Ali
"Those aren't pillows."
|
Posted - 07/11/2007 : 11:15:43
|
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
quote:
Originally posted by Ali
There are a number of films about Troy, Salopian: Helen of Troy, The Trojan War, not to mention countless documentaries. Under the revised guidelines, the review is fine, but it wasn't when I first reported it.
There are not that many documentaries about it, but more importantly it would not really fit those so well, as it aligns oneself with the Trojans, which a documentary would not do. Even under the old rules, where there were a few films about a specific historical event or character (or a few films of the same book etc.), 'too generic' would not tend to apply.
It would since Helen of Troy and The Trojan War are considered flawed classics (especially the former), and the Trojan Horse is clearly a huge development in both. I can think of at least one documentary, The Trojans, that also investigates historical links with the legend, and, again, the review would also be fine for that one, too.
quote:
I have got no problem with my reviews being reported where valid - this just wasn't an instance of that.
I don't want to dwell on this, but, yes, it was a perfect instance of that. It isn't now, but it definitely was at the time.
I do see your point, and Whipper's, and I know I am almost alone in my opinion of "the report button." Still, fuck it, Eppur Si Muove, it's weird, and I will never ever use it (again).
|
Edited by - Ali on 07/11/2007 11:18:00 |
|
|
|
Sean
"Necrosphenisciform anthropophagist."
|
Posted - 07/11/2007 : 13:00:10
|
Keep in mind that benj was the one who declined it. And he's the boss.  |
|
|
|
thefoxboy 
"Four your eyes only."
|
Posted - 07/11/2007 : 14:52:03
|
quote:
Originally posted by Whippersnapper
If you want to see the downside of trying to tell someone about a problem with their review (rather than just reporting it), and I don't assign any blame here, look at the recent "Mike Tyson" thread. "Foxboy Gets Ears Boxed".
I learned a long time ago how badly an honest straight-forward approach can be received by some people, so now I only raise a review problem directly with those who I feel would take it in the right spirit.
Anyone else, where appropriate, its the anonymity of the report button I'm afraid.
I posted it where I did to stop other reviews being submitted for it.
I also posted a link to a movie that contained footage of the ear biting incident. Dunno if Wildhart saw that or not. |
|
|
|
Whippersnapper.
"A fourword thinking guy."
|
Posted - 07/11/2007 : 15:22:08
|
fair enough.
|
|
|
|
w22dheartlivie
"Kitty Lover"
|
Posted - 07/14/2007 : 04:42:52
|
quote:
Originally posted by thefoxboy
quote:
Originally posted by Whippersnapper
If you want to see the downside of trying to tell someone about a problem with their review (rather than just reporting it), and I don't assign any blame here, look at the recent "Mike Tyson" thread. "Foxboy Gets Ears Boxed".
I learned a long time ago how badly an honest straight-forward approach can be received by some people, so now I only raise a review problem directly with those who I feel would take it in the right spirit.
Anyone else, where appropriate, its the anonymity of the report button I'm afraid.
I posted it where I did to stop other reviews being submitted for it.
I also posted a link to a movie that contained footage of the ear biting incident. Dunno if Wildhart saw that or not.
No, I didn't see it, I didn't read the thread after the last time I posted. I will submit and ask Benj if he will move my review to that film so I don't lose the 20 votes I already have on it. Thanks. |
|
|
|
damalc
"last watched: Sausage Party"
|
Posted - 08/01/2007 : 01:43:02
|
i thought this one, though hilarious to me, had only a slim chance of making it through.
many of the characters in "Boyz N The Hood," including Ice Cube and the character he kills at the end, wore the mysteriously popular-at-the-time hairstyle known as the jheri curl, seen here, worn by O'Shea "Ice Cube" Jackson.
sadly, the MERPS saw fit to reject "When Curls Collide."  |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
|
|
Rejected reviews
