| Author |
 Topic  |
|
Demisemicenturian 
"Four ever European"
|
 Posted - 07/16/2007 : 10:48:54
|
quote:
Originally posted by demonic
American History X With Spoilers. Actors and plot specific.
This is an interesting one in terms of validity. Capitalising an initial letter might have the meaning of emphasis, but can a middle letter be capitalised when not a play on words (i.e. just to be random)? That would probably be taking things too far, so let's say this sort of thing counts as uniqueness. (Your review may well fit the criterion even without this anyway.)
I had voted on most of yours already, and there were a couple I didn't get. |
 |
|
|
ChocolateLady
"500 Chocolate Delights"
|
Posted - 07/16/2007 : 11:36:31
|
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
quote:
Originally posted by ChocolateLady
Notice I put it as "Gypsy's" since the cap and quotation marks are important.
But capitalisation and inverted commas don't only mean titles - they can also be emphasis and indicate so-called respectively (as I've already said in this thread).
Well, one is better than none, I guess.
|
|
|
|
bife
"Winners never quit ... fwfr ... "
|
Posted - 07/16/2007 : 11:46:18
|
How about my Name's XX. X XX for XXX?
Combines uniqueness with bife's brilliant humour. Maybe.   |
Edited by - bife on 07/16/2007 11:47:12 |
|
|
|
Ali 
"Those aren't pillows."
|
Posted - 07/16/2007 : 11:48:26
|
Can it not work for the sequel, too, though?
|
|
|
|
bife
"Winners never quit ... fwfr ... "
|
Posted - 07/16/2007 : 11:51:47
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ali
Can it not work for the sequel, too, though?
I didn't even know there was a sequel  |
|
|
|
Ali
"Those aren't pillows."
|
Posted - 07/16/2007 : 12:03:27
|
I am sorry I shattered the illusion.
|
|
|
|
Beanmimo 
"August review site"
|
|
|
demonic
"Cinemaniac"
|
Posted - 07/16/2007 : 18:08:22
|
Ooh! I passed the test! Huzzah! Thanks Sal.
By the way, what didn't you get? |
Edited by - demonic on 07/16/2007 18:09:30 |
|
|
|
Demisemicenturian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 07/28/2007 : 20:03:38
|
Sorry that this round turned out to be so fraught. I did not expect that at all. I take back what I said about looking for alternative films (I cannot be bothered), but I'm still a bit disappointed that so many people posted reviews that were obviously unlikely to fit, and especially that some links to reviews that I have proven to not fit have not been deleted.
Anyway, as a consequence, the next theme will be totally objective. |
Edited by - Demisemicenturian on 05/20/2008 17:27:36 |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
F.W.F.R.ers' challenge 5: uniqueness
