The Four Word Film Review Fourum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Return to my fwfr
Frequently Asked Questions Click for advanced search
 All Forums
 FWFR Related
 Reviews
 Seán's FYCTH - #500
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 5

chazbo 
"Outta This Fuckin' Place"

Posted - 04/29/2009 :  19:53:28  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Done.

Go to Top of Page

BaftaBaby 
"Always entranced by cinema."

Posted - 04/29/2009 :  20:07:10  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
vv

Go to Top of Page

Conan The Westy 
"Father, Faithful Friend, Fwiffer"

Posted - 04/29/2009 :  20:43:40  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
V&V
Go to Top of Page

Sean 
"Necrosphenisciform anthropophagist."

Posted - 04/29/2009 :  21:26:26  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
FYCTH #001 without the highlighting.

It's interesting to see how many of those in round one are still here.
Go to Top of Page

Josh the cat 
"ice wouldn't melt, you'd think ....."

Posted - 04/29/2009 :  22:12:58  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
VR&VA

I first posted in the fourum 3/12/2004

I was reading the fourum for ages before I plucked up the courage to post.

My first FYCTH was #47 9/12/2004

been hooked ever since!

Josh the cat
Go to Top of Page

Whippersnapper. 
"A fourword thinking guy."

Posted - 04/29/2009 :  23:10:21  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
v
Go to Top of Page

BiggerBoat 
"Pass me the harpoon"

Posted - 04/30/2009 :  00:03:46  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
vv
Go to Top of Page

thefoxboy 
"Four your eyes only."

Posted - 04/30/2009 :  00:08:22  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
D

Go to Top of Page

[matt] 
"Cinemattic."

Posted - 04/30/2009 :  00:09:24  Show Profile  Reply with Quote

VV

Loads of 5/5s from me:

thefoxboy, ahaa, RockG01f, BiggerBoat, demonic and Yukon!


Go to Top of Page

Demisemicenturian 
"Four ever European"

Posted - 04/30/2009 :  01:47:03  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Whippersnapper

Does it seem like 500 to you?
Well, actually...


I thought of the pun first but you have managed to find a better film on the I.M.D.B.

Edited by - Demisemicenturian on 04/30/2009 02:08:07
Go to Top of Page

Demisemicenturian 
"Four ever European"

Posted - 04/30/2009 :  02:01:18  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by BiggerBoat

I don't think a borough is an 'arbitrarily small unit'. Besides which even if you put all the boroughs together, it's done by percentage so London would still be second.

I think you have to put it in inverted commas because it's hardly an official title.

Type 'gay capital of Britain' into Google and all you get is results that refer to Brighton. I would say that's pretty clear cut, although I'm looking forward to the more definitive results that Salopoogle throws up.

My objections are based on such a statement having a horrible tweeness, and that casually saying that sort of thing when its parameters are so vague creates an otherness that has a negative effect. It's like when women make that appalling, banal comment that all the best-looking men are gay. And it would be like me as a white person going around saying that such and such a place is the black capital of Britain. If I just said that that place has a relatively high black population (in a context where there is some valid point in noting that), then that would be fine.

Boroughs are arbitrarily small units for the point at hand, just not an arbitrary units in general. They play essentially no part in people's cultural lives: it's only the whole city that means anything to this issue. Yes, it's done by percentage but that doesn't make that reasonable. It's the total population that matters. Similarly, London is the de facto general capital of this country because it has the largest number of institutions, not the highest density of them per capita.

If it has been put in inverted commas here, then it wouldn't have been too bad as it would have acknowledged that it is a silly thing to say.

The number of hits only measures how frequently this lazy statement is repeated: it doesn't make it true. However, "gay capital of the uk" brighton even so brings in only a few more results than "gay capital of the uk" london.

Edited by - Demisemicenturian on 04/30/2009 02:19:41
Go to Top of Page

Demisemicenturian 
"Four ever European"

Posted - 04/30/2009 :  02:06:35  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by ChocolateLady

quote:
Originally posted by Salopian

It's a shame that we cannot retract votes. I had unfortunately already voted on thefoxboy's topical pun by the time I saw Rock Golf's older one.

Why? They both work, if you ask me. I voted for both of them (and I worked my way backwards through the posts this time).

But yes, because of the more obvious film title, Rocky's does work a bit better.

It's not that Rock Golf's works better. It's that both use exactly the same idea and so there is no value in having both of them on the site. I don't mean that thefoxboy's should not have been allowed, as there is no such rule, but it's only Rock Golf who deserves the credit.

Edited by - Demisemicenturian on 04/30/2009 02:09:53
Go to Top of Page

Demisemicenturian 
"Four ever European"

Posted - 04/30/2009 :  02:12:51  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by demonic

As usual I'm astounded... watch as all the pleasure of the round is leeched away by the "dullest pedant in the UK" (BBC News - Southern Counties).

I doubt very much that you can only gain pleasure by repeating lazy statements, but if so you have my sympathy.

As for pedantry, I only noted my simple disagreement. It's BiggerBoat who went overboard with all the faulty statistics.

Edited by - Demisemicenturian on 04/30/2009 02:14:30
Go to Top of Page

demonic 
"Cinemaniac"

Posted - 04/30/2009 :  04:11:48  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Voted! And gave everyone an extra random 5 votes as promised. Even Salopian. Happy 500!

Now then...

quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
It's not that Rock Golf's works better. It's that both use exactly the same idea and so there is no value in having both of them on the site. I don't mean that thefoxboy's should not have been allowed, as there is no such rule, but it's only Rock Golf who deserves the credit.

As Foxboy's came only 50 approved reviews after Rockgolf's isn't it entirely likely that they had the idea at pretty much the same time? As it happens I went to submit the exact review for "Porco Rosso" myself a couple of days ago and saw Foxboy had got there first. If he hadn't I'd have been in like a shot, regardless of Rockgolf's review, and he wouldn't "deserve the credit" for it at all. He'd get my vote for having the same excellent idea as me.

quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
I doubt very much that you can only gain pleasure by repeating lazy statements, but if so you have my sympathy.

As for pedantry, I only noted my simple disagreement. It's BiggerBoat who went overboard with all the faulty statistics.



The pleasure I'm referring to is taking part in FYC and interacting on this forum without your endless refutations, corrections, unassailable opinions and superiority. I wish you'd stop being such a monumental bore. By the way, next time you visit Brighton the gay mafia have vowed to knife you and throw you off the pier. Have a nice trip.
Go to Top of Page

ChocolateLady 
"500 Chocolate Delights"

Posted - 04/30/2009 :  06:47:17  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
It's not that Rock Golf's works better. It's that both use exactly the same idea and so there is no value in having both of them on the site. I don't mean that thefoxboy's should not have been allowed, as there is no such rule, but it's only Rock Golf who deserves the credit.


See, now - I've never understood this. I can see why having very similar reviews for the same movie doesn't do the site much good. MERPs often decline reviews for being too similar to previously approved review for that movie - and rightly so.

But the exact same review for totally different movies? Why aren't they equally valueable to the site, if they work equally as well for the different movies? Where's the harm? And why should only Rocky "deserve the credit"? Isn't it the luck of the draw which one gets through the MERPs first? The thing is, I doubt that Rocky contacted foxy and said "I have this great idea for a review that I'm gonna submit for X movie" and then foxy went out and found another film to use that same review for. If that had actually happened, then yes, foxy shouldn't get the credit as it would have been outright stealing of Rocky's idea. As it is, they're both equally valueable to the site and both should stay.

(That isn't what happened, is it Rocky?)

Go to Top of Page
Page: of 5 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
The Four Word Film Review Fourum © 1999-2024 benj clews Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000