| Author |
 Topic  |
|
benj clews 
"...."
|
 Posted - 08/29/2009 : 19:31:56
|
quote:
Originally posted by clay
I can live with the rejection, but I'd like more room to explain my entries in the future. So many times I will get a "Don't understand" or other evidence that the MERP doesn't understand . . .
Thanks for listening.
As I understand it, this decline was in part down to at least one of the MERPs not having seen the film- it's not out in most parts of the world yet- and because the research they did in order to make up for not having seen it yet made no mention of poached eggs.
I'm assuming this oversight wouldn't have happened had there been the space to explain the poached eggs reference, so I'm going to double the explanation when I get chance this weekend. Hopefully this will reduce future confusion. |
 |
|
|
randall 
"I like to watch."
|
|
|
lemmycaution
"Long mired in film"
|
|
|
benj clews
"...."
|
Posted - 09/01/2009 : 10:39:17
|
quote:
Originally posted by benj clews
quote:
Originally posted by clay
I can live with the rejection, but I'd like more room to explain my entries in the future. So many times I will get a "Don't understand" or other evidence that the MERP doesn't understand . . .
Thanks for listening.
As I understand it, this decline was in part down to at least one of the MERPs not having seen the film- it's not out in most parts of the world yet- and because the research they did in order to make up for not having seen it yet made no mention of poached eggs.
I'm assuming this oversight wouldn't have happened had there been the space to explain the poached eggs reference, so I'm going to double the explanation when I get chance this weekend. Hopefully this will reduce future confusion.
Change is there now. Apologies for taking longer than I planned to do this. Mind, it was a Bank holiday here yesterday so it was kind of a long weekend for me (if that's any defence). |
|
|
|
Whippersnapper. 
"A fourword thinking guy."
|
Posted - 09/01/2009 : 13:57:54
|
Not technically a defence, but it goes to mitigation.
I shall be recommending an unconditional discharge. 
Just don't let it happen again. That's all!
|
|
|
|
clay 
"Viewer discretion is revised."
|
Posted - 09/01/2009 : 14:29:49
|
quote:
Originally posted by benj clews
quote:
Originally posted by benj clews
quote:
Originally posted by clay
I can live with the rejection, but I'd like more room to explain my entries in the future. So many times I will get a "Don't understand" or other evidence that the MERP doesn't understand . . .
Thanks for listening.
As I understand it, this decline was in part down to at least one of the MERPs not having seen the film- it's not out in most parts of the world yet- and because the research they did in order to make up for not having seen it yet made no mention of poached eggs.
I'm assuming this oversight wouldn't have happened had there been the space to explain the poached eggs reference, so I'm going to double the explanation when I get chance this weekend. Hopefully this will reduce future confusion.
Change is there now. Apologies for taking longer than I planned to do this. Mind, it was a Bank holiday here yesterday so it was kind of a long weekend for me (if that's any defence).
Thank you, sir! |
|
|
|
ci�nas
"hands down"
|
Posted - 09/04/2009 : 00:10:01
|
quote:
Originally posted by benj clews
quote:
Originally posted by benj clews
quote:
Originally posted by clay
I can live with the rejection, but I'd like more room to explain my entries in the future. So many times I will get a "Don't understand" or other evidence that the MERP doesn't understand . . .
Thanks for listening.
As I understand it, this decline was in part down to at least one of the MERPs not having seen the film- it's not out in most parts of the world yet- and because the research they did in order to make up for not having seen it yet made no mention of poached eggs.
I'm assuming this oversight wouldn't have happened had there been the space to explain the poached eggs reference, so I'm going to double the explanation when I get chance this weekend. Hopefully this will reduce future confusion.
Change is there now. Apologies for taking longer than I planned to do this. Mind, it was a Bank holiday here yesterday so it was kind of a long weekend for me (if that's any defence).
benj, is this working correctly? I've just resubmitted a declined review, & altho I was able to type up to 200 characters only 100 of them were showing after I clicked UPDATE. Are 200 characters visible to you but not to me?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
benj clews
"...."
|
Posted - 09/04/2009 : 00:23:06
|
quote:
Originally posted by lamhasuas
benj, is this working correctly? I've just resubmitted a declined review, & altho I was able to type up to 200 characters only 100 of them were showing after I clicked UPDATE. Are 200 characters visible to you but not to me?
Thanks.
Yeah- you're right. Just the first 100 chars came through.
I've made a small change- give it another shot and see if it looks any better. |
|
|
|
ci�nas
"hands down"
|
Posted - 09/04/2009 : 00:34:18
|
quote:
Originally posted by benj clews
quote:
Originally posted by lamhasuas
benj, is this working correctly? I've just resubmitted a declined review, & altho I was able to type up to 200 characters only 100 of them were showing after I clicked UPDATE. Are 200 characters visible to you but not to me?
Thanks.
Yeah- you're right. Just the first 100 chars came through.
I've made a small change- give it another shot and see if it looks any better.
Nope. I can still only see the first 1/2 of what I wrote. (If you can see all of it I have no idea what's showing to you now because I tried to retype the second 1/2 to see if that would work...)
|
Edited by - ci�nas on 09/04/2009 00:59:34 |
|
|
|
benj clews
"...."
|
Posted - 09/04/2009 : 10:19:16
|
quote:
Originally posted by lamhasuas
Nope. I can still only see the first 1/2 of what I wrote. (If you can see all of it I have no idea what's showing to you now because I tried to retype the second 1/2 to see if that would work...)
Right- give it one more try now  |
|
|
|
Josh the cat 
"ice wouldn't melt, you'd think ....."
|
Posted - 09/04/2009 : 11:22:27
|
quote:
Originally posted by benj clews
quote:
Originally posted by lamhasuas
Nope. I can still only see the first 1/2 of what I wrote. (If you can see all of it I have no idea what's showing to you now because I tried to retype the second 1/2 to see if that would work...)
Right- give it one more try now
Benj
I just added a comment to a pending review 438746 THE COMMENT IS A SPOILER FOR INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS I then updated, I then went back to the comment and the whole comment remained so it seems to be working
Hope this helps
Josh the cat |
|
|
|
ci�nas
"hands down"
|
Posted - 09/04/2009 : 11:23:27
|
quote:
Originally posted by benj clews
quote:
Originally posted by lamhasuas
Nope. I can still only see the first 1/2 of what I wrote. (If you can see all of it I have no idea what's showing to you now because I tried to retype the second 1/2 to see if that would work...)
Right- give it one more try now
Yes, sorted: I've re-retyped it & it's all visible.
Thank you.
I suspect it'll be redeclined again in due course, mind you. But what the hell. 
|
|
|
|
ci�nas
"hands down"
|
Posted - 09/04/2009 : 17:56:12
|
quote:
Originally posted by lamhasuas
quote:
Originally posted by benj clews
quote:
Originally posted by lamhasuas
Nope. I can still only see the first 1/2 of what I wrote. (If you can see all of it I have no idea what's showing to you now because I tried to retype the second 1/2 to see if that would work...)
Right- give it one more try now
Yes, sorted: I've re-retyped it & it's all visible.
Thank you.
I suspect it'll be redeclined again in due course, mind you. But what the hell.
To the MERP who declined it: fair enough. I take your point (& your bracket, colon, &c). Pushing the envelope somewhat there really.
Cheers.
|
|
|
|
Topic |
|
Suggestion from a madder-than-a-wet-hen guy
