| Author |
 Topic  |
|
benj clews 
"...."
|
 Posted - 02/23/2006 : 01:38:48
|
quote:
Originally posted by lemmycaution
The reference to football here
http://www.fwfr.com/display.asp?ID=12124
suggests that toonbug is referring to the 1978 'Heaven Can Wait' which has nothing to do with the Ameche film but is a remake of 'Here Comes Mr. Jordan'.
There Goes Mr. Review. |
 |
|
|
benj clews
"...."
|
Posted - 02/23/2006 : 01:40:47
|
quote:
Originally posted by lemmycaution
Also, jeep's review for this film should read "Angel", I think.
Every time a bell rings an angel is misspelled. Probably.
Fixed. |
|
|
|
benj clews
"...."
|
Posted - 02/23/2006 : 01:42:08
|
quote:
Originally posted by Whippersnapper
And luckynmbrfour's Modovar should be Almodovar.
Alfixed. |
|
|
|
Nate 
|
Posted - 02/27/2006 : 00:21:12
|
For 1776, "Washington: hot new singer!" is inaccurate; General Washington was out fighting during the Second Continental Congress and is mentioned, but never seen, in the musical.
http://www.fwfr.com/display.asp?ID=1725 |
Edited by - Nate on 02/27/2006 00:23:45 |
|
|
|
ChocolateLady 
"500 Chocolate Delights"
|
Posted - 02/27/2006 : 07:15:43
|
| For White Christmas, the review "'Holiday Inn' in Technicolor" is inaccurate. While the song White Christmas was introduced in the film Holiday Inn the two films aren't based on the same story at all. Holiday Inn is about opening a nightclub in Connecticut that has shows only on Holidays and White Christmas is about two war vets who do a Christmas show at their former commanding officer's lodge in Vermont in order to help him out. |
|
|
|
MM0rkeleb 
"Better than HBO."
|
Posted - 03/04/2006 : 21:02:41
|
I feel like a heel for bringing this up, but here goes.
A majority (i.e., 3 out of 5) of the posted reviews for Flowers in the Attic make reference to the incestuous relationship between the two main characters that drives the novel.
However, the filmmakers unwisely elected to remove that plot point from the film entirely, making these reviews unfortunately inaccurate.
Note: I don't think Gentleman Ghost's review is inaccurate under these circumstances, since the other case of incest mentioned in the book was kept in the film.
|
|
|
|
thefoxboy 
"Four your eyes only."
|
Posted - 03/08/2006 : 00:57:35
|
Any reviews here referring to Rambo killing people are wrong.
http://www.fwfr.com/display.asp?id=518
He doesn't kill anyone in this movie. 
There is only one death that we see and that's Bill McKinney who falls out of the helicopter.
|
Edited by - thefoxboy on 03/08/2006 00:57:58 |
|
|
|
TitanPa
"Here four more"
|
Posted - 03/08/2006 : 01:38:01
|
quote:
Originally posted by M0rkeleb
I feel like a heel for bringing this up, but here goes.
A majority (i.e., 3 out of 5) of the posted reviews for Flowers in the Attic make reference to the incestuous relationship between the two main characters that drives the novel.
However, the filmmakers unwisely elected to remove that plot point from the film entirely, making these reviews unfortunately inaccurate.
Note: I don't think Gentleman Ghost's review is inaccurate under these circumstances, since the other case of incest mentioned in the book was kept in the film.
Since we are talking about books. I saw Five People You Meet in Heaven the other day. The Tv movie. In the book he gets killed by a coaster. In the movie he gets killed by a 'Drop' ride. Yes...I even deleted my review. Although im still credited for adding the movie. SOOOO..some reviews are factually inaccurate. Sorry guys. |
|
|
|
thefoxboy
"Four your eyes only."
|
Posted - 03/08/2006 : 01:44:29
|
quote:
Originally posted by TitanPa
quote:
Originally posted by M0rkeleb
I feel like a heel for bringing this up, but here goes.
A majority (i.e., 3 out of 5) of the posted reviews for Flowers in the Attic make reference to the incestuous relationship between the two main characters that drives the novel.
However, the filmmakers unwisely elected to remove that plot point from the film entirely, making these reviews unfortunately inaccurate.
Note: I don't think Gentleman Ghost's review is inaccurate under these circumstances, since the other case of incest mentioned in the book was kept in the film.
Since we are talking about books. I saw Five People You Meet in Heaven the other day. The Tv movie. In the book he gets killed by a coaster. In the movie he gets killed by a 'Drop' ride. Yes...I even deleted my review. Although im still credited for adding the movie. SOOOO..some reviews are factually inaccurate. Sorry guys.
Well I have just written a replacement for it.  |
|
|
|
Whippersnapper. 
"A fourword thinking guy."
|
Posted - 03/08/2006 : 03:03:59
|
quote:
Originally posted by TitanPa
Since we are talking about books. I saw Five People You Meet in Heaven the other day. The Tv movie. In the book he gets killed by a coaster...
Still, its worth the risk to avoid getting ring marks on tables or tablecloths, don't you think?  |
|
|
|
ChocolateLady
"500 Chocolate Delights"
|
Posted - 03/08/2006 : 07:28:15
|
quote:
Originally posted by thefoxboy
quote:
Originally posted by TitanPa
quote:
Originally posted by M0rkeleb
I feel like a heel for bringing this up, but here goes.
A majority (i.e., 3 out of 5) of the posted reviews for Flowers in the Attic make reference to the incestuous relationship between the two main characters that drives the novel.
However, the filmmakers unwisely elected to remove that plot point from the film entirely, making these reviews unfortunately inaccurate.
Note: I don't think Gentleman Ghost's review is inaccurate under these circumstances, since the other case of incest mentioned in the book was kept in the film.
Since we are talking about books. I saw Five People You Meet in Heaven the other day. The Tv movie. In the book he gets killed by a coaster. In the movie he gets killed by a 'Drop' ride. Yes...I even deleted my review. Although im still credited for adding the movie. SOOOO..some reviews are factually inaccurate. Sorry guys.
Well I have just written a replacement for it.
You shouldn't have to re-write too much - Voight's character does work at an amusement park fixing rollercoasters in the film.
(I only got to see about 20 minutes of it when it was on TV the other day. Hope they re-run it, since it looks interesting.)
|
|
|
|
thefoxboy
"Four your eyes only."
|
Posted - 03/08/2006 : 09:32:47
|
quote:
Originally posted by ChocolateLady
quote:
Originally posted by thefoxboy
quote:
Originally posted by TitanPa
quote:
Originally posted by M0rkeleb
I feel like a heel for bringing this up, but here goes.
A majority (i.e., 3 out of 5) of the posted reviews for Flowers in the Attic make reference to the incestuous relationship between the two main characters that drives the novel.
However, the filmmakers unwisely elected to remove that plot point from the film entirely, making these reviews unfortunately inaccurate.
Note: I don't think Gentleman Ghost's review is inaccurate under these circumstances, since the other case of incest mentioned in the book was kept in the film.
Since we are talking about books. I saw Five People You Meet in Heaven the other day. The Tv movie. In the book he gets killed by a coaster. In the movie he gets killed by a 'Drop' ride. Yes...I even deleted my review. Although im still credited for adding the movie. SOOOO..some reviews are factually inaccurate. Sorry guys.
Well I have just written a replacement for it.
You shouldn't have to re-write too much - Voight's character does work at an amusement park fixing rollercoasters in the film.
(I only got to see about 20 minutes of it when it was on TV the other day. Hope they re-run it, since it looks interesting.)
Well I haven't deleted my coaster one. |
|
|
|
TitanPa
"Here four more"
|
Posted - 03/08/2006 : 13:22:33
|
I rented the movie by the way. I think it was too expensive for a TV movie to make the coaster jump the track. I had to delete mine. Was plain and simply wrong.
"Coaster claims 1" |
Edited by - TitanPa on 03/08/2006 13:23:13 |
|
|
|
silly
"That rabbit's DYNAMITE."
|
Posted - 03/08/2006 : 14:54:17
|
Am I the only one that watches threads like this to see if their own reviews are being 'reviewed'?
I am?
Well, alrighty then. Carry on. |
|
|
|
TitanPa
"Here four more"
|
Posted - 03/08/2006 : 16:45:10
|
quote:
Originally posted by silly
Am I the only one that watches threads like this to see if their own reviews are being 'reviewed'?
I am?
Well, alrighty then. Carry on.
i dont make it a habit. But I do cross my fingers when i do. Not to see my review being reviewed. |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
Reviews that are wrong
