| Author |
 Topic  |
|
benj clews 
"...."
|
 Posted - 08/28/2008 : 20:56:07
|
quote:
Originally posted by Whippersnapper
For resubs, is it any advantage to put in the note what the original review was, or is that automatically seen anyway by the MERPs?
Yep, we get a history of the review basically so you shouldn't need to include the original. |
 |
|
|
Demisemicenturian 
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 08/29/2008 : 01:24:08
|
quote:
Originally posted by benj clews
I said the review queueing allocation system doesn't work like that. In other words, the way reviews are distributed across my and the MERPs' queues doesn't guarantee someone other than myself will get it for reapproval. Nobody, except you, brought up this idea that comments are just sent off into the ether and never seen, much as it would make a nice conspiracy theory.
What's that got to do with the price of fish? I was talking about comments being ignored and previously approved reviews getting rejected. I therefore assumed that your "doesn't work like that" was to do with comments being available or not (or jokily MERPs not being able to remember a general instruction). Whom comments go to makes absolutely no difference to my point, as you can clearly see if you read the above posts.
However, I have previously asked whether reviews go back to the same MERP, because of the fact that they now sometimes ask direct questions and there is not always room in the comment to keep the explanation already there and add the answer to the question. This didn't receive a response. |
Edited by - Demisemicenturian on 08/29/2008 02:02:07 |
|
|
|
BaftaBaby 
"Always entranced by cinema."
|
Posted - 08/29/2008 : 01:38:50
|
I'm sure I'm not the only one here who is sad that you seem so unhappy lately. I hope you feel better soon.
|
|
|
|
benj clews
"...."
|
Posted - 08/29/2008 : 01:51:34
|
| For the record, when reviews are resubbed, they get sent down a series of tubes, kicked by a big boot on the end of a stick into a random selection of buckets which then spill the reviews onto a big fan. The fan blows the reviews onto greased chickens which then run across a mine field. The reviews that reach the other side on unexploded chickens get washed off and down a big waterfall into a big roulette wheel. The reviews that settle into Red 6 get approved, the reviews in Black 9 get declined and the rest are randomly approved by this week's bingo winner from Streatham's Happy Place Nursing Home. |
|
|
|
Demisemicenturian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 08/29/2008 : 02:01:05
|
quote:
Originally posted by BaftaBabe
I'm sure I'm not the only one here who is sad that you seem so unhappy lately. I hope you feel better soon.
I'll feel perfectly fine just as soon as the absurdly chaotic and opaque system is sorted out. |
|
|
|
benj clews
"...."
|
Posted - 08/29/2008 : 02:05:29
|
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
quote:
Originally posted by BaftaBabe
I'm sure I'm not the only one here who is sad that you seem so unhappy lately. I hope you feel better soon.
I'll feel perfectly fine just as soon as the absurdly chaotic and opaque system is sorted out.
Oh alright then- we'll lose the chickens. |
|
|
|
MguyXXV
"X marks the spot"
|
Posted - 08/29/2008 : 07:11:10
|
NOT THE CHICKENS????!!!! 
|
|
|
|
w22dheartlivie
"Kitty Lover"
|
Posted - 08/29/2008 : 07:46:18
|
quote:
Originally posted by MguyX
NOT THE CHICKENS????!!!!
But we do have to be mindful of the vegans and animal rights advocates around us. Let's substitute toads for the chickens. |
|
|
|
Sean 
"Necrosphenisciform anthropophagist."
|
Posted - 08/29/2008 : 08:21:22
|
Well at least benj doesn't use penguins for minefield detonation. 
<=== And if he did I'd set my attack penguin on him!  |
|
|
|
Whippersnapper. 
"A fourword thinking guy."
|
|
|
Topic |
|
Gayz
